should United States government policy favor certain kinds of immigrants? Should ( citizenship) preference be given to the neediest applicants? The most talented? The most oppressed? The richest? should applications from certain countries be given priority?
answer:
When the pilgrim founded America, they were fleeing the same type of immigration prejudice that existed in their own country that is why they came to America. They established America as the land of the free. Everyone from all over the world is welcome that is how democracy was established in this country. The people who build this country were immigrants from all parts of the world that is what America is all about. To suddenly discriminate against immigrants of any kind flies in the face of the democracy in which this country was established to discriminate against what is now called illegal immigrants, denies them of the freedom that their forefathers were given. As when this country was established all immigrants wherever they from should be accepted. There is no one in this country of America who is a native. Their forefathers came here as immigrants and that’s what we all are and nobody can deny that.
We are all immigrants as were our forefathers therefore this should never change in the land of democracy – America under any circumstances. After all this is supposed to be the land of the free.
I do not believe that applications from any countries should be given priority. No countries should be denied access because that is the premise on which this great nation was founded. That is called democracy – the land of the free. Again, the United States has a skill-based point system that gives equal opportunity to all people who have equal skills regardless of race or nationality. As a result, any system proposed will prioritize certain countries application one way or another. The best system will be to randomly raffle every application out and that is the very foundation on which this country exists.
The statue of liberty in New York says “we accept your poor, your hungry and we accept you whoever you are”. That should never change in this land of democracy.
Your first two paragraphs are unnecessary to answer this question.
I suggest you start with these sentences from your third paragraph:
I do not believe that applications from any countries or groups should be given priority. The best system will be to randomly raffle off every application for immigration.
You may want to include more -- but those two sentences answer the question.
The question of whether the United States government policy should favor certain kinds of immigrants is a complex and debated topic. There are different arguments and perspectives on this issue.
One perspective is that the government policy should prioritize the neediest applicants. This argument suggests that providing opportunities to those who are most in need, such as refugees or those escaping persecution, aligns with humanitarian principles and demonstrates a commitment to helping those who are most vulnerable. Advocates for this perspective argue that it is the moral duty of a nation to provide assistance and refuge to those in need.
Another perspective is that the government policy should favor the most talented applicants. This argument emphasizes the potential benefits that skilled immigrants can bring to the country, such as economic growth and innovation. Supporters of this view believe that by prioritizing individuals who possess specialized skills, the country can enhance its competitiveness and strengthen various sectors of the economy.
Some argue that the government policy should give preference to the most oppressed applicants. This perspective emphasizes the importance of supporting individuals who have experienced significant hardship and discrimination. Advocates believe that by prioritizing those who have faced oppression, the government can play a role in promoting social justice and equality.
There is also a viewpoint that the government policy should favor the richest applicants. This argument suggests that wealthy individuals can make substantial investments in the country, create job opportunities, and contribute to economic growth. Supporters of this perspective believe that attracting individuals with significant financial resources can have positive impacts on the economy and overall prosperity.
Lastly, there is the perspective that applications from certain countries should be given priority. This argument may be based on factors such as diplomatic relations, economic partnerships, or historical ties. Supporters of this viewpoint believe that prioritizing certain countries can serve political or economic interests and strengthen international relations.
It is important to note that immigration policies are shaped by various considerations, including national interests, economic needs, humanitarian concerns, and political factors. The decision on which perspective to adopt or prioritize is ultimately a matter of political will and values. Public opinion, political debates, and societal norms also influence the government's approach to immigration policy.
In conclusion, the question of whether the United States government policy should favor certain kinds of immigrants is subjective and dependent on individual perspectives and values. The decision-making process involves weighing competing interests, balancing humanitarian concerns with economic considerations, and considering historical and geopolitical factors. Ultimately, it is up to the government and the democratic process to determine the immigration policies that best reflect the values and interests of the country.