Why is it recommended to establish a formal evaluation criterion when considering the purchase of hardware for the organization?
If you don't have a good list of the specifics that your new system/hardware will be required to perform, you may buy products that don't meet your needs or will meet those needs for only a short time ... and then you'll need to upgrade.
(good list of specifics = evaluation criteria)
Also, you might want to keep in mind that "criterion" is a word meaning one item in your list of specifics; "criteria" is the plural form of the word. I think your question needs to have the plural form of the word in it.
iwant pictures of ram rom floppys and cds
Establishing a formal evaluation criterion when considering the purchase of hardware for an organization is important for several reasons. It helps ensure that the organization makes informed decisions based on specific needs and requirements rather than making ad-hoc or impulse purchases. Here's how you can establish a formal evaluation criterion:
1. Identify organizational needs: Determine the specific requirements and objectives that the hardware should fulfill. Consider factors such as performance, compatibility, scalability, security, and budget limitations.
2. Research hardware options: Gather information about different hardware options available in the market that align with the identified needs. This can include researching various brands, models, specifications, and features.
3. Define evaluation criteria: Establish specific evaluation criteria based on the identified needs. This can include factors such as performance benchmarks, technical specifications, reliability, warranty and support, compatibility with existing systems, pricing, and potential for future upgrades.
4. Compare options: Evaluate and compare different hardware options based on the defined evaluation criteria. This can involve creating a matrix or scoring system to objectively assess each option against the criteria.
5. Prioritize criteria: Assign weights or priorities to each evaluation criterion based on their relative importance to the organization. This allows for more accurate comparisons and decision-making.
6. Involve stakeholders: Consider input from various stakeholders within the organization, such as IT personnel, finance department, and end-users. This helps ensure that the evaluation criteria cover all relevant perspectives and considerations.
7. Test and benchmark: Whenever possible, conduct tests or benchmarks to evaluate the hardware's actual performance against the defined criteria. This can involve running simulations, performing pilot projects, or soliciting vendor demonstrations.
8. Review vendor credentials: Assess the reputation, track record, and customer reviews of the vendors or manufacturers providing the hardware options being considered. This can help gauge the reliability, quality, and after-sales support that they offer.
9. Make an informed decision: Based on the evaluation and comparison of options, select the hardware that best meets the defined evaluation criteria and aligns with the organization's needs, budget, and long-term goals.
By establishing a formal evaluation criterion, organizations can make rational and well-informed decisions, reducing the risk of purchasing hardware that does not adequately meet their needs or wasting resources on unnecessary features. It also provides a transparent and standardized process that can be repeated for future hardware purchasing decisions.