posted by .

i am not quite clear why the No child left behind act has been called unconstitutional. Many articles that I've read say that it is because it requires states to pay to go forth with the program. It violates the spending clause but can anyone explain exactly which line of it.


Here is the spending clause for reference:
Section 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings;--And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

  • history -

    Perhaps it has to do with the absence of any education wording in the Constitution. Education has always been left up to each state to determine and control.

    If something is not in the Constitution, then it cannot be called unconstitutional, right?

    If I'm wrong, another teacher will correct me, but that's how I've always understood it.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Constitution

    if an amendment violates the constitution,why should the Supreme court block its ratification?
  2. NCLB

    i am studying the no child left behind act and i read that some states have a higher level of proficiency than others. In a pdf there were a comparision of two states type of question both with a dificulty level can anyone help me …
  3. History

    In the Second Agricultural Adjustment Act, I need to know what that agency did. The only thing my book says is it did not include a processing tax to pay for farm subsidies which was declared unconstitutional. Does anyone have a web …
  4. United States History

    the least controversial actions of president bush regarding?
  5. us history

    What issue needed to be settled before the smaller states agreed to the articles of confederation?
  6. us history

    How did the Supreme Court rule on the Indian Removal Act?
  7. Civics/History

    1. How did the US Constitution solve the problem created by a weak executive branch in the Articles of Confederation?
  8. American Government

    Do you think our country's history would be different if the Articles of Confederation had remained as our constitution?
  9. History

    Which two weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were exposed by Shays’s Rebellion The national government was subject to all of the states collectively and could not collect funds owed, leading to unfinanced veteran back pay. …
  10. History

    Which two weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were exposed by Shays’s Rebellion The national government was subject to all of the states collectively and could not collect funds owed, leading to unfinanced veteran back pay. …

More Similar Questions