Milton purchased a riding lawn mower from Jack's Law and Garden Shop, a retailer. During the first use, Milton is injured while mowing the hill behind his home when the seat of the mower comes loose and he is thrown from the mower. Milton may sue Jack's Shop on the basis of

a. Is it Negligence
b. products liability
c. breach of warranty of fitness for particular purpose
d. breach of and express warranty

Mr. Brown president of Brown's Moving&Storage, decides the company should expand by purchase another truck. He contactd Mr. Black. After discussing concerning use, specification and price, Mr. Brown places an order for one 1985 White tractor for $50,000.The next day, Mr. Black sends a letter to Mr. Brown comfirming the purchase, style and delivery date. Mr. Bown does not respond. This contract is

a.Is it Violative of the Statute of Frauds
b. Enforceable by both parties
c. UnEneforceable
d. a&b
e. none above

I believe the answer to question #1 is Products Liability.

As to #2, I believe it is enforceable by both parties as Mr. Black had sent Mr. Brown a letter - conversation already took place showing intent.

For question #1, you are correct that the basis on which Milton can sue Jack's Law and Garden Shop is products liability. This is because the riding lawn mower was defective, causing Milton's injury.

To arrive at this answer, you can analyze the situation as follows:
- Negligence: Negligence typically involves a failure to exercise reasonable care, which may not necessarily apply in this case.
- Breach of warranty of fitness for a particular purpose: This generally refers to situations where a product does not perform as intended or advertised, but it may not be the most appropriate basis for this scenario since the defect in the mower is not related specifically to its fitness for a particular purpose.
- Breach of an express warranty: If there was a specific warranty provided by the retailer, such as a guarantee of the mower's safety, this could potentially be a basis. However, the scenario does not provide information about any express warranty being made.
- Products liability: This is the most suitable basis in this case as it deals with injuries or damages caused by defective products.

For question #2, you are also correct that the contract is enforceable by both parties.

To determine this, you can look at the following:
- Violative of the Statute of Frauds: The Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing to be enforceable. In this case, there is no indication that the contract falls within the specific requirements of the Statute of Frauds.
- Unenforceable: For a contract to be unenforceable, there must be some legal reason why it cannot be upheld. However, nothing in the scenario suggests any legal grounds for the contract to be unenforceable.
- Enforceable by both parties: Since Mr. Black sent a letter to Mr. Brown confirming the purchase, style, and delivery date, this indicates clear intent and agreement between the parties. Therefore, the contract is enforceable by both parties.

Hence, the correct answer to question #2 is that the contract is enforceable by both parties.