Philosophy

posted by .

1. Determine whether the following arguments are valid or invalid. If valid determine whether they are sound. Be sure to explain what validity is and how you determine whether an argument is valid or not. Explain your answers in as much detail as you can. There is no length restriction on your answer; make it as long as necessary to answer the question in the required detail.

a.) If I study hard I’m sure to get an A in philosophy, but I haven’t studied at all; So I can’t get an A.

b.) If a number is greater than 7 then it is greater than 4. 8 is greater than 7, therefore it is greater than 4.

c.) If I want an A in philosophy I need to study for the exam, since I haven’t studied for the exam that means that I don’t want an A.

d.) No computers can feel pain. The human brain is a computer so no human brains feel pain.

e.) How do I know that Hillary Clinton is a liar? All politicians lie to get ahead and Hillary Clinton is a politician!

f.) If 4 is prime then it is divisible only by 1 and itself. 4 is not prime therefore it is divisible by numbers other than 1 and itself.

g.) Some doctors watch Lost and some people who like Lost are conspiracy theorist so some doctors are conspiracy theorists.

  • Philosophy -

    a) isn't a valid argument because the conclusion doesn't follow from the two premises. There's a possibility that you could get an without studying hard.

    b) is valid.

    Check this site for a good explanation of validity.

    http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/vocab/validity.html

    We'll be glad to check the rest of your answers.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Philosophy

    a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group …
  2. Philosophy

    a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group …
  3. Philosophy

    a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following argument is valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group …
  4. CRT 205

    your response to the following: Of the two arguments provided in the digital story, which is valid and which is sound?
  5. math

    please help... determine if the argument is valid or invalid along with the appropriate form of argument. if harvard hustles then harvard wins harvard wins ___________________ harvard hustles are these statements: valid by law of detachment …
  6. math

    Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. Give a reason to justify answer. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. (Points : 2) Valid by the law of detachment Valid by the law of contraposition …
  7. Critical Thinking

    Determine whether the arguments are valid or invalid, and explain your answer in each case. 1) If anything is a trout, then it's a fish. A dolphin is not a fish. Therefore, a dolphin is not a trout. (More statements to come...)
  8. philosophy

    Truth tables can determine which of the following?
  9. Logic

    Truth tables can determine which of the following?
  10. math for liberal arts

    construct a truth table to determine whether each argument is valid. Be sure to state whether it is valid or invalid with each question. 1) ~p v q p ____ triangle of dots p^~q

More Similar Questions