"What position would you take on appeasement if you had been living in Canada during the 1930's and had heard about Adolf Hitler and the Nazis? Explain why"

Hi, could you please help me by giving me some sort of direction on what i should do, i am not sure if i should be for or against appeasement, which one can be better supported.
-Thanks in advance :)

Whether to appease Hitler or not was at the time -- and in some ways still is -- a controversial move.

Those who wanted to appease him really believed that if they gave him what he wanted that war would be avoided. The British and other Europeans were still suffering from their terrible losses in World War I some 20 years before. On the other hand, some people believed that if you give a bully what he wants, he'll continue to want more.

To help you make up your mind, please read this site.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeasement_of_Hitler

I don't really think that Hitler really had to execute 6 million Jews. I learned that when he had some Jewish friends back in his child hood days. I know that he hates Jews but what he did to the innocent Jews was pure evil.

And also he was the dictator of Germany, he isn't even from Germany. He also thinks that the Aryan race (blue eyes and blonde hair) is the master race. He's not even Aryan!

oh yeah, sorry. Hitlers not German, he's Austrian. He took over his home country! Evil I tell you.......pure evil.

To help you form your position on appeasement during the 1930s, it's important to consider the historical context and analyze the different perspectives. Here are some steps you can take to better understand the topic and form your own opinion:

1. Research the events: Start by learning about the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany, as well as their aggressive foreign policy. Understand their intentions and actions leading up to World War II.

2. Understand appeasement: Appeasement refers to the policy of making concessions to an aggressor in order to avoid conflict. Familiarize yourself with the key proponents of appeasement, such as British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who believed that giving in to Hitler's demands would maintain peace.

3. Critically evaluate arguments for appeasement: Consider the motivations behind appeasement. Some argue that it was a pragmatic approach to preventing another devastating war, as World War I was still fresh in the public's memory. Analyze the compromises made by Western powers in the Munich Agreement of 1938 and assess whether they were justifiable.

4. Assess the consequences: Evaluate the outcomes of appeasement. Consider how Hitler used the policy as an opportunity to further expand Nazi Germany's power and influence, ultimately leading to World War II and the Holocaust. Reflect on the lives lost and the impact on global security.

5. Consider alternative perspectives: Explore arguments against appeasement. Some critics argue that it only delayed the inevitable war, allowing Hitler to strengthen his military capabilities further. Analyze whether stronger actions earlier on could have deterred aggression and prevented the immense human suffering that followed.

6. Apply your values and beliefs: Reflect on your own beliefs and moral principles. Consider the potential ethical implications of appeasement and whether it aligns with your values or contradicts them.

By following these steps, you'll be able to gather information, analyze different viewpoints, and ultimately form your own position on appeasement during the 1930s. Remember, it is important to base your stance on historical evidence and critical thinking.