I found MacKinnon's "Sexuality" essay interesting, she argues that women's sexuality is socially constructed by male dominance and that women's subordination result from the sexual dominance of women by men. MacKinnon explains that because men's sexual desires toward women are aggressive and erotic, this can lead to distorted views of women's sexuality and their expected sexual behavior which can then lead to violent male domination over women. Thus, she gives the examples of and ography and how they represent a type of oppression towards women. She states "submission erocticized defines femininity". Meaning all men are aggressive dominator that use women as a submissive victim and that all sex is a form of dominance. Basically male sexuality is sexuality defined for women. Although I enjoyed this essay, I could not stop my self from feeling guilty, thus in a way Mackinnon claims that all type of sexual intercourse or penetration is oppressive to women. Does this mean that by having sex and enjoying it I will be engaging in women's oppression? Though I do understand that an truly agree with MacKinnon that only when women manage to free themselves from this discrimination are we able to develop and build ourselves individually.

Question

I found MacKinnon's "Sexuality" essay interesting, she argues that women's sexuality is socially constructed by male dominance and that women's subordination result from the sexual dominance of women by men. MacKinnon explains that because men's sexual desires toward women are aggressive and erotic, this can lead to distorted views of women's sexuality and their expected sexual behavior which can then lead to violent male domination over women. Thus, she gives the examples of and ography and how they represent a type of oppression towards women. She states "submission erocticized defines femininity". Meaning all men are aggressive dominator that use women as a submissive victim and that all sex is a form of dominance. Basically male sexuality is sexuality defined for women. Although I enjoyed this essay, I could not stop my self from feeling guilty, thus in a way Mackinnon claims that all type of sexual intercourse or penetration is oppressive to women. Does this mean that by having sex and enjoying it I will be engaging in women's oppression? Though I do understand that an truly agree with MacKinnon that only when women manage to free themselves from this discrimination are we able to develop and build ourselves individually.

Answer 1

I am not going to deal with the English or grammar.

I haven't read MacKinnon's work, but
I do know that any argument that uses "all" or "none" — especially in a psychological or sociological framework — is very likely to be flawed. Are the "all" statements her words or your words? Do you believe "all men are alike"?

People tend to sort others into ingroups ("us") and outgroups ("them"). This sorting varies from person and can change according to situations and mood. At the extremes, you can include all humans as "us" or — like a person with severe paranoia — nobody.

Even though there are variations within both categories, people are more likely to make finer disinctions with ingroup members but ignore these distinctions with outgroup members. How do you think MacKinnon is responding?

Another argument you might consider is that women have a major influence in socializing their children, both boys and girls. Do you think that they might not be taking advantage of this ability — especially in raising their sons?

I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.

Answer 2

MacKinnon's essay presents a feminist perspective on sexuality and argues that women's sexuality is socially constructed within a framework of male dominance. While it is important to understand and engage with different viewpoints, it is also essential to critically evaluate the arguments presented.

Regarding your question about feeling guilty or whether engaging in sexual intercourse implies participating in women's oppression, it is essential to recognize that no single perspective can capture the complexity of human experience and relationships. It is important to distinguish between consensual, respectful, and equal sexual relationships from oppressive and violent ones. Engaging in consensual sexual experiences that are based on mutual respect, communication, and consent does not inherently perpetuate women's oppression. It is crucial to prioritize consent, agency, and equality within sexual relationships.

It is worth noting that different feminists hold diverse views on the relationship between sexuality and women's oppression. While MacKinnon's argument emphasizes the potential for men's sexual desires to contribute to the objectification and subordination of women, other feminists argue for the possibility of reclaiming and empowering women's sexuality. These diverse perspectives highlight the ongoing conversations and debates within feminism.

As you mentioned, MacKinnon's essay also emphasizes the need for women to free themselves from discrimination and develop as individuals. This points towards the importance of challenging existing power structures and promoting gender equality in all aspects of life, including sexuality and relationships.

In conclusion, while engaging with MacKinnon's essay and any other critical perspectives on sexuality, consent, agency, and equality should always be the key principles guiding our actions and beliefs. It is crucial to critically evaluate different viewpoints and engage in conversations that promote understanding and respect.