# science

posted by JESSICA

from the point of view of an enviromentalist,what is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
a)coal is preferable resource to oil.
b)oil corporations are falsely advertising an oil shortage in order to expand thier drilling operations.

1. drwls

Neither are true, and neither are good arguments. Coal is more abundant now, and cheaper per energy produced if you are running a dirty coal powqer plant, but it is a worse source of pollution and the mnining of it is a worse environmental problem than offshore oil drilling. The second argument is even more ridiculous.

The technology to produce liquid fuels from coal (which are needed for transportation mainly) is available, but you yet economically competitive with petroleum. In another decade it may be.

2. Anonymous

c

## Similar Questions

1. ### SCIENCE

FROM the point of view of an evriromentalist,which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
2. ### science

which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
3. ### social studies

From the point of view of an environmentalist, which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
4. ### social studies

From the point of view of an environmentalist, which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
5. ### science

from the point of view of a environmentalist , which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drillin for oil ?
6. ### social studies

From the point of view of an environmentalist, which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
7. ### algebra

an oil drilling company knows that it costs \$25000 to sink a well. If oil is hit, the income for the drilling company will be \$375000. If only natural gas is hit, the income will be \$135000. If nothing is hit there will be no income. …
8. ### Algebra Last question for tonight

An oil-drilling company knows that it costs \$25,000 to sink a test well. If oil is hit, the income for the drilling company will be \$395,000. If only natural gas is hit, the income will be \$125,000. If nothing is hit, there will be …
9. ### social studies

From the point of an environmentalist, which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
10. ### math

An oil-drilling company knows that it costs \$25,000 to sink a test well. If oil is hit, the income for the drilling company will be \$405,000. If only natural gas is hit, the income will be \$125,000. If nothing is hit, there will be …

More Similar Questions