Comparing Sexism with Racism
Feminist writers Marylyn Cudd and Leslie Jones, suggest that comparing sexism with racism, can help indentify women’s oppression. “Sexism” a comparative analysis essay, contains that, racism, like sexism, is grounded in the assumption that people can be categorized into different groups based on a necessary set of shared physical, psychological characteristics. Sexism and racism have similar social mechanism; systematic violence and economic disadvantage. Cudd and Jones claim that “both are different to pinpoint, but can be statistically documented and are much more readily perceived by the victims than by the respective dominant groups” (pg 75). Also, sexism and racism affect individuals psychologically, as well as, give rise to a powerful “backlash” when they are publicly challenged (pg 75).
In addition, Cudd and Jones reject the explanation for sexual inequality based on women being inferior, by nature, to men. To this they declare that there is insufficient scientific evidence in which makes the argument weak.
They, however, prefer the second explanation, in which women are systematically disadvantage by society.
They define sexism as a “systematic, pervasive but often subtle force that maintains the oppression of women and that is at work through institutional structures, in interpersonal interactions and the attitudes that are expressed in them, and in cognitive linguistic, and emotional process of individual minds” (pg 76). In short, sexism structures our very experience of the world, and makes us that world on the whole worse for women than for men.
Cudd and Jones indicate what makes the sexist attitudes into oppression is their attachment to “systematic inequality”. Therefore, because of this oppression, women are not able to achieve the reality of their hidden political and moral capabilities.
Finally, it’s not enough just to say that there are sexist attitudes and institutions that shape women’s lives or even that these are interconnected in important ways. In order to be a feminist in general, one arguably has to accept a certain causal story
Feminist writers<~~add comma Marylyn Cudd and Leslie Jones, suggest that comparing sexism with racism,<~~delete comma can help indentify<~~sp? women’s oppression. “Sexism”,<~~add comma before closing quotation marks a comparative analysis essay, contains that,<~~delete comma racism, like sexism, is grounded in the assumption that people can be categorized into different groups based on a necessary set of shared physical,<~~delete comma and add "and" psychological characteristics. Sexism and racism have similar social mechanism;<~~use "mechanisms" and change semicolon to colon systematic violence<~~add comma and economic disadvantage<~~use "disadvantages". Cudd and Jones claim that “both are different<~~"different"? or "difficult"? to pinpoint, but can be statistically documented and are much more readily perceived by the victims than by the respective dominant groups” (pg 75). Also, sexism and racism affect individuals psychologically, as well as,<~~delete comma give rise to a powerful “backlash” when they are publicly challenged (pg 75).
In addition, Cudd and Jones reject the explanation for sexual inequality based on women being inferior, by nature, to men. To this they declare that there is insufficient scientific evidence in which makes the argument weak.
They, however, prefer the second explanation, in which women are systematically disadvantage by society.
They define sexism as a “systematic, pervasive but often subtle force that maintains the oppression of women and that is at work through institutional structures, in interpersonal interactions and the attitudes that are expressed in them, and in cognitive linguistic, and emotional process of individual minds” (pg 76). In short, sexism structures our very experience of the world, and makes us that world on the whole worse for women than for men.
Cudd and Jones indicate what makes the sexist attitudes into oppression is their attachment to “systematic inequality”. Therefore, because of this oppression, women are not able to achieve the reality of their hidden political and moral capabilities.
Most of the problems in here are with comma uses; there are also some word use issues and some spelling errors. You need to read over the other paragraphs and revise; the same types of errors are in them that are in the first paragraph.
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/commas.htm
In addition, if you are using MLA guidelines for your citations, you should not be using "pg" in the parentheses where you put the page numbers. Only the number of each page should be in the parentheses.
Please repost if you want further feedback.
=)
that links sexism to women's oppression. This causal story involves recognizing that sexist attitudes and institutions contribute to and perpetuate systematic inequalities that disadvantage women in various aspects of their lives.
Comparing sexism with racism can be helpful in identifying women's oppression because both sexism and racism are grounded in the assumption that people can be categorized into different groups based on certain characteristics. Both forms of oppression involve systemic violence and economic disadvantages. They can be statistically documented and are more readily perceived by the victims than by the dominant groups.
Furthermore, sexism and racism have psychological effects on individuals and often lead to a powerful backlash when challenged. This suggests that the systems of sexism and racism are deeply ingrained and resistant to change.
Cudd and Jones reject the notion that sexual inequality is based on women being naturally inferior to men. They argue that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support this argument. Instead, they argue for the explanation that women are systematically disadvantaged by societal structures and institutions.
According to Cudd and Jones, sexism is a pervasive and subtle force that maintains the oppression of women. It operates through institutional structures, interpersonal interactions, and the attitudes expressed in them. Sexism structures the very experience of the world and creates a worse overall reality for women compared to men.
The attachment of sexist attitudes to systematic inequality is what makes them oppressive. This oppression prevents women from fully realizing their political and moral capabilities.
To be feminist, it's not enough to simply acknowledge the existence of sexist attitudes and institutions. One must also accept a certain causal story that explains how sexism leads to women's oppression. This involves recognizing the interconnectedness of sexist attitudes and institutions and their contribution to systematic inequalities.
that explains how sexism operates and how it leads to women's oppression. This understanding is crucial in order to address and challenge sexism effectively.
Cudd and Jones argue that comparing sexism with racism can help in identifying women's oppression. They highlight that both sexism and racism are rooted in the notion that people can be categorized into different groups based on shared physical or psychological characteristics. They also note that sexism and racism have similar social mechanisms, such as systematic violence and economic disadvantage.
One key point made by Cudd and Jones is that sexism and racism are often more easily perceived by the victims than by the dominant groups. This is because the dominant groups may not experience the direct consequences of these forms of discrimination. It is important to listen to and center the experiences of those who are oppressed in order to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of sexism and racism.
Furthermore, both sexism and racism have psychological impacts on individuals. They can cause harm to one's self-esteem, self-worth, and overall well-being. Additionally, when these issues are publicly challenged, there is often a powerful "backlash" that occurs. This backlash can manifest in various ways, including pushback against efforts to address and eradicate sexism and racism.
Cudd and Jones reject the notion that sexual inequality is based on women being inherently inferior to men. They argue that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support this claim, and therefore it is a weak argument. Instead, they advocate for the explanation that women are systematically disadvantaged by society. They argue that sexism is a pervasive force that maintains the oppression of women through institutional structures, interpersonal interactions, and individual attitudes.
According to Cudd and Jones, sexism structures our experiences of the world, making it worse for women overall. It restricts women from realizing their full political and moral capabilities. They emphasize that the key factor that turns sexist attitudes into oppression is their attachment to systematic inequality.
In conclusion, Cudd and Jones argue that understanding the causal story of how sexism operates and leads to women's oppression is essential for being a feminist. It is not enough to simply acknowledge the existence of sexist attitudes and institutions. To truly challenge and address sexism, it is necessary to comprehend its workings and how it perpetuates inequality.