# Logic

posted by .

Using the law of inference, prove if the below argument is valid.

(P1) R -> B
(P2) D V R
(P3) B
/D

You may imply all rules of inference to figure out if it is valid.

## Similar Questions

1. ### Philosophy

a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following argument is valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group …
2. ### Philosophy Logic

Use the 17 rules of inference to prove the following arguments valid?
3. ### Logic

Supply steps in a proof of a valid argument and give reasons using rules of inference. 1.)~A*B 2.)C>A 3.)CvD/D
4. ### Logic

Need help supplying proo f for the following problem using the rules of inference 1. (Z.Y)> X 2. ~O>Z 3. ~Y>O 4. ~O.T /S
5. ### logic

I need help proving these arguments using rules of inference, please. (S>B) > (SvK) (Kv~D) ~ (H>S) ~S.W / ~H ~A > (B>~C) ~D > (~C >A) D v ~A ~D
6. ### math

Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. Give a reason to justify answer. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. (Points : 2) Valid by the law of detachment Valid by the law of contraposition …