What does the term bruised ego mean when put into dialogue with worls of Freud and Erik Erikson. What are potential reprecussions of bruised ego in both models? What would be the consequence of such a thing in either theory? Is there a big difference?
A bruised ego would suggest damage to one's self-image, self esteem or ego identity. I searched Google under the key words "Freud Erikson 'self-image'" to get these possible sources:
http://books.google.com/books?id=qfEyo5HWo2oC&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=freud+erikson+%22self+image%22&source=web&ots=vDezBpTyyf&sig=PfeB6Cr06k9xqTWzp7EDPM3dOfM#PPA126,M1
http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/genpsyerikson.html
http://www.answers.com/topic/ego-identity?cat=health
(Broken Link Removed)
http://books.google.com/books?id=G_s8_xoQZewC&pg=PA107&lpg=PA107&dq=freud+erikson+%22self+image%22&source=web&ots=cYCe3iUrVr&sig=etAG1z1Qw4EPB-27bEPn6ln86DM
What if one's ego identity were negative? Would that be a bruised ego?
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
The term "bruised ego" is not a specific concept in the works of Sigmund Freud or Erik Erikson. However, we can explore similar concepts related to ego and its potential repercussions in both models.
In Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory, the ego refers to the rational and conscious part of the mind that mediates between desires of the id (the unconscious) and the superego (the moral conscience). The concept of a bruised ego can be related to Freud's notion of the defense mechanism called "ego defense mechanisms." These defense mechanisms are unconscious strategies the ego uses to protect itself from anxiety or threats. When the ego is bruised or threatened, it may trigger specific defense mechanisms such as denial, repression, or projection.
In Erik Erikson's psychosocial theory, the ego has a central role in each of his stages of psychosocial development. Each stage involves a specific psychosocial crisis that individuals must navigate successfully to develop a healthy ego and a well-adjusted sense of self. A bruised ego, in this context, could imply a disruption or failure in resolving a particular psychosocial crisis. This may result in feelings of mistrust, shame, guilt, or inferiority, which can have long-lasting consequences on one's self-esteem and identity formation.
The potential repercussions of a bruised ego in both models can be significant. In Freudian theory, constant use of defense mechanisms to protect the ego may lead to distortion of reality, relationship issues, and the development of neurotic symptoms. In Erikson's theory, if the ego fails to adequately resolve psychosocial crises, it may result in psychological maladjustments, difficulties in establishing healthy relationships, or a weakened sense of personal identity.
While there are some overlaps, the main difference lies in their theoretical focus. Freud's psychoanalytic theory concentrates on the internal conflicts between the unconscious drives, whereas Erikson's psychosocial theory emphasizes the interaction between individual development and the social environment. Thus, the consequences of a bruised ego in either theory may vary slightly due to their different theoretical frameworks and the specific stages or defense mechanisms involved.
Remember, the concept of a bruised ego is not directly addressed in the works of either Freud or Erikson. However, by understanding the concepts of ego, defense mechanisms, and psychosocial crises, we can begin to explore the potential repercussions and consequences of a challenged or threatened ego in their respective theories.