Sultan Mehmet wanted only the walls and buildings of the city, Constantinople; but his soldiers could keep the rest. Why?

http://www.google.com/search?q=Sultan+Mehmet&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7SUNA

Your answer may be in here somewhere.

=)

i get test

The reason Sultan Mehmet wanted only the walls and buildings of Constantinople, while allowing his soldiers to keep the rest, can be explained through historical context and strategic considerations.

Firstly, it is important to understand that Constantinople held great significance both culturally and strategically. It was the capital of the Byzantine Empire, which had been declining in power and influence for centuries. By capturing Constantinople, Mehmet would not only establish his rule over the city but also symbolically claim the legacy of the Roman Empire, as the Byzantine Empire was the direct successor to the ancient Roman Empire.

As for the decision to allow his soldiers to keep the rest of the city, it was a tactic to motivate and reward his troops. The siege of Constantinople was a massive undertaking, and Mehmet needed a motivated and loyal army to achieve his objective. By promising his soldiers plunder and spoils, he incentivized them to fight harder and push for victory.

Moreover, allowing his soldiers to keep the looted treasures, wealth, and possessions of the city served as a way to compensate them for their efforts and as a means to prevent internal conflicts and discontent within his own ranks. It was a common practice in medieval warfare for victorious troops to be granted the right to loot cities they had captured, which often served as motivation for soldiers to participate in battles and sieges.

In summary, Sultan Mehmet's decision to claim only the walls and buildings of Constantinople while allowing his soldiers to keep the rest was both a strategic move to establish his dominion over the city and a tactical maneuver to motivate and reward his troops for their efforts.