posted by kg
explain the pros and cons of legal moralism.
Thank you for using the Jiskha Homework Help Forum. Hopefully something in these sites will help you:
2. www.mises.org/journals/jls/4_3/4_3_2.pdf (This is a pdf file you will have to download)
3. http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~echaveza/phi310.htm (This is a course syllabus that lists texts germaine to the subject)
4. (Broken Link Removed) (From the Harvard Law School)
For several decades, MBI, a multi-national corporation, has manufactured military tanks at several of its branches around the world. One of those branches in Country C sells its tanks both to the army of Country C and the army of Country D.
MBI does not have a branch in Country D. After delivering several hundred tanks to Country D, that country has refused to pay for them, complaining that they were defective. (It has nonetheless deployed them as its frontline battle tanks.)
MBI sued Country D in the courts of Country D. The courts of Country D dismissed a breach of contract action brought by the MBI several months ago. The rationale for the Court's decision is that that the army is immune from suit in its courts.
Can MBI bring suit in a Country C court?
Is legally and ethically prudent for MBI to do so?
In your own words, please post a response to both parts of the Discussion Board question, and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.
(From Assignment List): Use of the IRAC Reasoning Procedure (as discussed in your MGT625 Tutorial forwarded to your AIU e-mail accounts) is REQUIRED on this assignment.
jfchyzmn spzyth bhcai codlrvw znrvdu ofjgl nsupygvjq