Bob is right. You need to expand your explanation. Consider whether cigarette advertising is misleading or false. When we had cigarette advertising on TV, the people who were smoking were cool, macho, and healthy. Are those people typical of smokers?
Was the advertising misleading?
Although a democracy is based on freedom of expression, most people recognize the need to allow the government to exercise control over such things as false and misleading advertisements or advertisements of illegal products. Is the banning of cigarette advertising on television consistent with these necessities? Explain.
This is my answer please let me know if I am correct. The banning of cigarette advertising on television IS consistent with these necessities because they could be advertising to people that cigarettes are illegal to.
You need to amplify: discuss what type of advertising is prohibited, and why. When a question says explain, you need to explain. Your answer was too terse to qualify for an explaination, in my opinion.
A number of people are opposed to the banning of cigarette advertising. It is important that you see both views. Very often your teacher is more interested in your reasoning ability or knowledge than your opinion. While your opinion is important the reasons for it and the knowledge of more than one viewpoint is what is essential.
It is quite possible that cigarette advertising is banned because it is not (1) false and misleading or (2)advertising of an illegal product.
The original statement includes the concept of "such things as" which would indicate that the above two are examples of control rather than the only reasons for government control. Other categories might include the very broad (3) not in the public interest, or (4) injurious to the public health. These other categories (3.4) very well may have more adherents to the concept that cigarette smoking should not be banned than the original two that were mentioned.
To answer whether cigarette advertising is misleading or false, we need to consider the typical portrayal of smokers in cigarette advertisements. The statement mentions that when cigarette advertising was on TV, the people depicted smoking were cool, macho, and healthy. However, the question asks if those people are typical of smokers.
To determine if the advertising was misleading, we should gather information on the typical characteristics of smokers and compare them to the portrayal in cigarette advertisements. This could involve conducting research and looking at empirical data on the demographics, health factors, and lifestyles of smokers.
Regarding the banning of cigarette advertising on television, we need to explain why it is consistent with the necessities of controlling false and misleading advertisements or those of illegal products. The response provided suggests that the ban is consistent because cigarette advertising might reach people who are unaware that cigarettes are illegal. However, this explanation is incomplete and could be further elaborated.
It would be helpful to discuss the specific types of advertising that are prohibited and explain why they fall under the mentioned necessities of government control. Additionally, it is important to explore both perspectives on the banning of cigarette advertising. The answer suggests that some people might oppose the ban, and it is crucial to provide reasoning and knowledge from multiple viewpoints.
Furthermore, the question raises the possibility of other categories for government control beyond false and misleading advertisements or advertising of illegal products. This includes factors such as being not in the public interest, or being injurious to public health. It would be valuable to expand on these categories and discuss how they relate to the banning of cigarette advertising, potentially considering opposing viewpoints in the process.
The original question asked whether cigarette advertising is misleading or false. In the past, when cigarette advertising was allowed on TV, the portrayal of smokers was often idealized. They were depicted as cool, macho, and healthy. However, it is important to consider whether these depictions accurately represent the typical smoker.
While the advertising may not have been outright false, it can be argued that it was misleading. The portrayal of smokers as healthy and attractive may have created a false perception of the risks associated with smoking. In reality, smoking is known to be a major cause of various health problems, including cancer, heart disease, and respiratory issues. The advertising focused on the positive aspects of smoking while downplaying or ignoring the negative health consequences, leading to a potential misrepresentation of the reality of smoking.
In terms of government control over advertisements, while a democracy values freedom of expression, there is a general recognition that certain restrictions are necessary. Advertising that is false, misleading, or promoting illegal products is typically regulated. The ban on cigarette advertising on television can be seen as consistent with these necessities.
To expand on the types of advertising that are prohibited, cigarette advertising on television is specifically targeted due to its potential harm to public health. Research has consistently shown the harmful effects of smoking, and public health officials have deemed it necessary to limit advertising that promotes a behavior known to cause significant health risks. The ban focuses on limiting the visibility and appeal of cigarette advertisements to reduce the influence they may have on individuals, particularly young people, who are more susceptible to adopting unhealthy behaviors.
It is important to note that there are differing opinions on the banning of cigarette advertising. Some argue that individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices and that the ban infringes upon their freedom of expression. Others may argue that the ban is necessary to protect public health and prevent the promotion of a harmful behavior.
Providing a thorough analysis of different viewpoints and reasoning abilities is crucial in addressing this topic. While personal opinions are important, it is essential to back them up with evidence, reasoning, and an understanding of multiple perspectives.