Provide one example each of classical and operant conditioning in life?
Identify the stimulus, response, and reinforcers in each case. Which type would you prefer for learning and why?
This should give you plenty of information to find your answers.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=classical+and+operant+conditioning+&btnG=Google+Search
Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Our tutors try to give you the information to help you complete your assignment on your own.
Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to critique your work.
=)
Perhaps noting the similarities and differences between classical and operant conditioning will help you think of real life examples.
Classical conditioning is characterized by several factors.
I. The key relationship is associating antecedent events.
II. It originates with reflexive behavior. The behavior is "built in."
III. Classical conditioning is essentially a process of stimulus substitution. The response essentially remains the same.
IV. The response is elicited, since the behavior is reflexive.
Operant (Instrumental) Conditioning was started by Skinner and his box. In contrast to classical conditioning, operant conditioning has some specific qualities.
I. Consequences to responses are the key relationship.
II. Emitted responses are voluntary rather than reflexive.
III. Response substitution occurs -- unreinforced responses go to extinction, while reinforced responses become stronger. Essentially operant conditioning is response contingent reinforcement.
You may want to look up some of the above terms.
Consult your texbook for ways to identify stimuli, responses and reinforcers.
Once you do this, only you can indicate your preferences.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
thank you...this helps...
Classical conditioning is a type of learning where a neutral stimulus becomes associated with a specific response through repeated pairings. One example of classical conditioning in real life is Pavlov's famous experiment with dogs. In this experiment, Pavlov rang a bell (neutral stimulus) before presenting food to the dogs, causing them to salivate (response). After repeated pairings of the bell with the food, the dogs began to salivate at the sound of the bell alone, even when the food was not present. In this example, the food is the reinforcer, as it is what causes the dogs to salivate.
Operant conditioning, on the other hand, focuses on the consequences of behaviors to determine whether they are likely to be repeated. One example of operant conditioning is training a dog to sit on command. When the dog sits (response), they are given a treat (reinforcer), which increases the likelihood that they will sit again in the future. In this example, the treat serves as a positive reinforcer, as it strengthens the behavior of sitting.
Both classical and operant conditioning have their advantages. Classical conditioning is useful for creating associations between stimuli. It can be helpful for overcoming fears and phobias, as well as creating positive associations with certain experiences. Operant conditioning, on the other hand, is more focused on shaping behaviors through reinforcement. It is effective for teaching new skills and behaviors.
Which type of conditioning is preferred for learning can depend on the situation and the individual. Classical conditioning may be preferred when trying to create positive associations or overcome fears, while operant conditioning may be preferred for teaching specific behaviors and skills. Ultimately, the preference for one type of conditioning over the other may vary based on the desired outcome and the individual's learning style.