The statement " has been concerned about verifying payments...and also about the financial management..." is ripe for legal detail. Concern is not enough if one is in charge: follow on action is required. Responsibility is a serious legal word, and the next word that follows in the absence of responsibility is negligence. The level of negligence is also fit for ripe legal argument, it varies from criminal to simple.
Please note that you have not clarified what your question is in any of your posts.
Please also note that we don't do students' homework for them. Once YOU have come up with YOUR OWN THINKING or a response to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to critique your work.
=)
There is a considerable amount of correspondence in evidence, and minutes of board meetings. I shall not describe this material in detail here. The correspondence shows that at least since early 2005, Mrs Ehsman has been concerned about verifying payments allegedly due by Timentel to DNB Global, and also about the financial management of Timentel more generally. The evidence is that the only bank account of Timentel has been relatively dormant at times when, the defendants allege, Timentel made payments to DNB Global. Mrs Ehsman's solicitors have written to Timentel's solicitors about these matters.
Based on the provided statement, it seems like there are legal issues surrounding the verification of payments and financial management of Timentel. The statement also mentions the responsibility of individuals in charge and the potential legal implications of negligence in this context.
To delve deeper into the legal aspects of this situation, you may want to consider the following steps:
1. Identify the legal jurisdiction: Determine the relevant country or region where the events took place, as different jurisdictions may have varying laws and regulations regarding payments and financial management.
2. Research relevant laws and regulations: Consult the applicable laws and regulations related to verifying payments, financial management, and professional responsibilities in the identified jurisdiction. Look for any specific requirements, obligations, or liabilities that might be relevant to the situation.
3. Analyze the correspondence and minutes of board meetings: Review the available evidence, such as the correspondence and minutes of board meetings, to understand the specific concerns raised by Mrs. Ehsman regarding payments and financial management. Look for any patterns, discrepancies, or actions that might be relevant to evaluating the situation legally.
4. Consider legal principles and concepts: Based on the evidence, analyze legal principles and concepts such as responsibility, negligence, and the standard of care in the given jurisdiction. Determine how these legal concepts may apply to the specific circumstances and actions taken by those involved.
5. Seek legal advice: If you are directly involved in this situation or require specific legal guidance, it is crucial to consult with a qualified attorney specializing in the relevant area of law. They can provide tailored advice based on the specific details of the case and ensure that your legal rights and obligations are properly addressed.
Note: It is important to remember that I am an AI bot, and the information provided is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Legal issues can be complex, and it is always recommended to consult with a qualified legal professional to address your specific situation properly.