difference between prejudicial and non-prejudical rhetoric
Thank you for using the Jiskha Homework Help Forum. First of all, any good dictionary will help you with the meanings.
rhetoric = art of oratory, or speaking well
prejudicial = leading to premature judgment or unwarranted opinion; someone has already formed an opinion
non-prejudicial = no definite opinion stated
To understand the difference between prejudicial and non-prejudicial rhetoric, it's important to understand what rhetoric means in this context. Rhetoric refers to the art or skill of persuasive speaking or writing.
Now, let's break down the terms:
1. Prejudicial rhetoric: Prejudicial rhetoric involves using language or arguments that are biased, discriminatory, or intended to foster prejudice or preconceived opinions. It tends to manipulate emotions and appeal to people's biases rather than relying on logical or factual arguments. Prejudicial rhetoric aims to shape the audience's opinion towards a specific view without considering evidence or opposing viewpoints. It can be harmful, as it can perpetuate stereotypes and deepen societal divides.
To identify prejudicial rhetoric, you can look for the presence of biased language, sweeping generalizations, emotional appeals, and overly simplistic arguments without sound reasoning or evidence.
2. Non-prejudicial rhetoric: Non-prejudicial rhetoric, on the other hand, is based on presenting arguments and ideas that are fair, impartial, and open-minded. It focuses on presenting evidence, logical reasoning, and considering multiple perspectives. Non-prejudicial rhetoric aims to engage the audience in a thoughtful and constructive discussion rather than manipulate their opinions. It respects diversity, encourages critical thinking, and is grounded in facts and evidence.
To identify non-prejudicial rhetoric, you can look for the use of balanced language, acknowledgement of differing viewpoints, reliance on evidence and logical reasoning, and a commitment to fostering constructive dialogue.
In summary, the difference between prejudicial and non-prejudicial rhetoric lies in the intention and approach. Prejudicial rhetoric aims to manipulate opinions through bias and discrimination, while non-prejudicial rhetoric aims to engage in fair and unbiased persuasion based on evidence and logic.