# Econ question trade part 2

posted by .

i posted this question yesterday. but i also got another questions

This is the chart

Canada produces 50 wheat and 20 Microchips
Jpn produces 2 wheat and 12 Microships

the original question was

1. If the terms of trade changed to 2 microships for one tonne of wheat, which country would benefit

ok so i calculated all the opportunity costs
1 wheat = 0.4 microchip
1 microchip = 2.5 wheat

for jpn
1 micro = 2/12 of wheat
1 wheat = 6 microchip

so in this case, canada specilizes in wheat and japan in microchips

so now to answer the question, i think japan would benefit the most because originally, japan would only get 2/12 of a wheat for one micro, but now they would get 2 microchips for one.....is that my reasoning correct???

Question 2.
Between what given range can these 2 countires agree to trade microchips for wheat.

i know it has to something about the range, but im not sure which one

I think your reasoning is on the right track. Without trade, japan gets 2/12 units of wheat for each chip. With trade they get 1/2 wheat for each chip (or 1 wheat for each 2 chips).

That said, I would be reluctant to say that japan benefits more than canada. Both countries benefit (in the case of canada before trade, they get .4 chip for each wheat).

2) Countries will trade if the terms of trade are better than not trading. So Canada will sell wheat for chips as long as it gets more than .4 chips for each wheat. Japan will buy wheat as long as it pays less than 6 chips for each wheat. So the final price for 1 wheat will be between .4 and 6 chips. Repeat this process for determining the price of chips in terms of wheat.

so for 2...the two countries will trade microchips for wheat as long as the final price for micro is between 2.5 and 2/12

## Similar Questions

1. ### microeconomics

I am having a problem with one of my homework questions and would like some help if possible...here is the question.. According to an article in the New York Times (Nov. 5, 1993),"many Midwest wheat farmers oppose the NAFTA free trade …

The following table provides date on the productivity of a single unit of resource in producing wheat and microchips in both canada and jpn wheat microships canada 50 20 jpn 2 12 now if terms of trade was 2 microships for one tonne …
3. ### econ question part 3

This is the chart Canada produces 50 wheat and 20 Microchips Jpn produces 2 wheat and 12 Microships the chart shows the productivity of ONE SINGLE UNIT of resource so if the question was Suppose that prior to the trade, each country …
4. ### economics

Suppose that there are two states that do not trade: Iowa and Nebraska. Each state produces the same two goods: corn and wheat. For Iowa the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of wheat is 3 bushels of corn. For Nebraska the opportunity …
5. ### economics

Suppose the USA and Canada are considering to trade. Assume there are only two goods in the economy: wheat and corn. The table below illustrates what each country can produce in a given year. Wheat Corn USA 4 2 Canada 5 8 In this case, …
6. ### Economics

The productivity of a single resource in producing wheat and microchips in both Canada and Japan: One unit of resouce produces: Canada 50 tons wheat, 20 microchips and Japan 2 tons wheat, 12 microchips. (a) What is the opportunity …
7. ### Economics

The productivity of a single resource in producing wheat and microchips in both Canada and Japan: One unit of resource produces: Canada 50 tons wheat, 20 micrchips and Japan 2 tons wheat, 12 microchips. (b) Suppose Canada is endowed …
8. ### economics

Suppose the USA and Canada are considering to trade. Assume there are only two goods in the economy: wheat and corn. The table below illustrates what each country can produce in a given year. Wheat Corn USA 4 2 Canada 5 8 In this case, …
9. ### Econ

I have spent a few hours on this question. Can anyone help?
10. ### math

in recent year, the world production of wheat was about 5.2 *10^8 metric tons. Canada produced 1/25 of this wheat. about how much wheat did Canada produce?

More Similar Questions