When facing the threat that a country
might be developing chemical and
biological weapons of mass destruction
for use by terrorists groups, a
libertarian would most likely:
A. oppose any military action by the
U.S. because libertarians are
pacifists.
B. oppose any military action by the
U.S. unless the United States was
directly attacked.
C. support military action, but only
if carried out with the approval
of the United Nations.
D. support military action, but only
if American troops were joined by
troops from European nations.
It is either B OR C. Can you help,
and give input to what the correct answer is? Thanks!
On that one I would go with your B. A strict libertarian , I do not believe, would worry about the UN.
To answer the question, let's break down the different options and analyze them according to libertarian principles:
A. Oppose any military action by the U.S. because libertarians are pacifists.
This option suggests that libertarians are pacifists and would oppose any military action. While some libertarians may hold pacifist beliefs, it is not a defining characteristic of libertarianism as a political philosophy. So, option A is not necessarily accurate.
B. Oppose any military action by the U.S. unless the United States was directly attacked.
Libertarianism is generally rooted in non-aggression and individual liberty. In this context, many libertarians advocate for a defensive military stance, which means military action should only be taken if the United States is directly attacked. This aligns with the principles of limited government intervention and non-aggression, making option B a plausible answer for a libertarian.
C. Support military action, but only if carried out with the approval of the United Nations.
Libertarianism generally emphasizes national sovereignty and limited government intervention. While libertarians may recognize the importance of multilateral cooperation, support for military action based on the approval of the United Nations, which involves supranational authority, may not align with libertarian principles. Therefore, option C might not be the most probable answer.
Considering the principles of limited government intervention, non-aggression, and individual liberty commonly associated with libertarianism, it seems that option B, opposing any military action by the U.S. unless directly attacked, is the most likely choice for a libertarian. However, it's important to note that individuals' political beliefs can vary, so not all libertarians will necessarily agree on this matter.