Post a New Question


posted by .

When the economy is at full employment, should the federal government run a budget deficit, surplus . Or neither? Explain.

Remember WWII? The US was at full employment then...but the expenditures great.
I am not and economics person, but the above example might lend one to think that there are other factors invoved besides employment.

Thanks, Bob Pursley. I hadn't thought of that angle -- that necessary and unusually high expenses are good reasons for running a budget deficit, even with high employment.

When the government, a company, or an individual runs a budget deficit, interest is paid on the amount owed. Why should we run a deficit when we have the money (i.e., full employment) to pay for the necessary goods and services? A surplus can be used to pay for additional services for the country's citizens and provide a cushion for any hard times that may lie ahead.

Thanks Ms. Sue! That makes a lot of sense!

You're welcome! Please also see BobPursley's and my answers about times with full employment but extraordinally high and necessary expenses.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question