Number of results: 6
Lingusitics
The only incorrect ones, grammatically, is #4 because it has 2 subjects and #6. #1 and #2 are clear but #3 and #5 do not specify that "students" were there. Sra
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 5:07pm by SraJMcGin
Lingusitics
Hi Sra, thanks for the help thus far. The textbook is: English Grammar , Language as Human Behavior 2nd Edition - Anita Barry
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 4:26pm by Bobby
Lingusitics
Hello everyone!! For these six sentences, I have to explain what determines whether the sentence is grammatical or not 1) Both the students were studying. 2) The students were both studying. 3) They were both studying. 4) *Both they were studying. 5) Both of you were studying...
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 5:07pm by Bobby
Lingusitics
"It is a widely held view in syntax that the constituents we have been calling noun phrases (NPs) are actually determiner phrases (DPs). In this view, all nouns are inside a DP, and if a sentence does not have an overt determiner, the head of DP will be a null element. ...
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 4:26pm by Gundu
Lingusitics
What reasons can I provide to jusify if there are correct or wrong? Please help i am totally lost... 1) Both the students were studying. --> ("Both" pre + "the"central ) 2) The studnets were both studying. --> ("The" central)......(...
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 5:07pm by Bobby
Lingusitics
Try some of the following links to see if anything will clarify this for you: http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&p=all+nouns+are+inside+a+DP%2C+and+if+a+sentence+does+not+have+an+overt+determiner%2C+the+head+of+DP+will+be+a+null+element. What text are using, in case ...
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 4:26pm by SraJMcGin
Pages: 1
For Further Reading
