Consider a specific moral question which might make it difficult to accept the relativist's response. State the moral issue involved, and provide an explanation as to why you think a relativist might have problem giving a justified response to it
Do human beings have any obligations to other animals, in terms of their treatment? If it is wrong to treat animals cruelly, why is it not wrong to eat them? Explain if, and how, you think humans can find a balance between treating animals ethically while also raising them for...
well, first all, this is all subjective, there is no correct answer. In the end, we're all judging based on our "gut" feeling. My own personal opinion is: eating animal is ok, because that's what we've evolved to do. Just name me one Olympic champion who ...