Jiskha Homework Help - Features: Is the SAT a Fair Test?

The Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT I) is a "right of passage for 2 million students each year and can be a major determinant in where they go to college" (Lemann "In His Own..."1). As years go by, more universities and parents are asking is, "Is it fair?" Nearly all colleges and universities select students based on SAT scores. These scores supposedly predict students' academic levels and promote diversity on the national level. Unfortunately, the test promotes elitism. There is a sense that the test determines which college a person attends and how he will do before he even enters. This is as unfair, like assuming there is water on Mars without stepping foot on it and looking. No one test truly measures someone's intellectual and economic future.

Outdoor view of Harvard's campus

Deep in the archives of Harvard University, there is an unfinished book called What We Are Fighting to Defend, which was written by Harvard's President James Conant at the outset of the Second World War. Conant was convinced that "the United States had gone from being a classless, democratic society to one that was relentlessly falling under the control of a hereditary aristocracy" (Lemann "Behind the SAT" 2). During the 1930's, most rich boys who had gone to New England boarding schools went to Harvard. When Conant became president of Harvard, he established a scholarship program to attract other students. With the number of school systems, it was impossible to directly compare students and decide who deserves the scholarships. Conant sent his assistants to create a method of selecting "scholarship students" (Lemann "Behind the SAT" 3). They found a test that could solve Conant's dilemma.

The SAT was created by Carl Brigham, a professor of psychology at Princeton. He developed IQ tests for army recruits before World War I. Brigham began to use the Army IQ test for college use, administering the SAT for the first time in 1926. At the opening of World War II, old college admission tests were replaced by the SAT; all applicants took it. At the conclusion of the Second World War, Conant established a nonprofit organization called the Educational Testing Service (ETS). The function of the ETS was to oversee administration of the test at several locations in the country. Ironically, Brigham did not approve the formation of the ETS. He predicted that "a big, new testing agency that had to survive financially on fees paid by the takers of its test, [ETS] would inevitably be devoted mainly to protecting and promoting the tests, rather than to evaluating and improving them" (Lemann "Behind the STA" 7). Despite this warning, the ETS lives on.

ETS analysis of recent test scores show that the SAT may be bias towards women and minorities. This year women scored 38 points lower than male test takers. In 1993, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology conducted a study showing that SAT under predicted women's scores (Toch 1). When they compared the SAT scores and grades of men and women, they found that women's grades were equal or better, but SAT scores were lower. Even ETS researchers reached the same conclusion.

The SAT is very effective at eliminating academically strong minority students who apply with strong academic records but relatively low SAT scores ("The SAT: Questions..." 4). Minorities and first generation students face more obstacles on the test than male white test takers. A qualified minority may not score well because his English was insufficient. The quickness required to finish the test is also too much for students whose first language is not English ("The SAT: Questions..." 4). Although the SAT is suppose to help colleges decide who to admit, "colleges that have made the SAT an optional report that their applicant pools are more diverse and that there has been no drop off in academic quality ("The SAT: Questions..." 4).

Besides under predicting college grades, the SAT is also misused. The National Merit Scholarship Corporation uses the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT), another form of the SAT, to determine which students are awarded with scholarship money based on scores. All PSAT scores are sent to the National Merit Scholarship Corporation. They evaluate each score. Students with high scores are considered semi-finalists. Then other personally qualities and talents of the test-taker are evaluated. This should have done before the test is administered. What if extremely talented students are excluded because of a low-test score? This test should not "filter" out other academically strong students. Like the SAT, males score higher on PSAT although girls earn better grades in school ("The SAT: Questions..." 4). Obviously, this is not a fair way to give away scholarship money.

The SAT test has numerous amounts of flaws and factors that could be detrimental to one's life. SAT consists of seven timed sections. All the questions are multiple choice, except fifteen math questions. Although ETS said that multiple-choice questions "only measures the outcome of a thought process, not the steps along the war," all questions on the SAT are mostly multiple-choice ("What Every Parent..." 4). Another problem is that test questions are independent from high school curriculum. Students have to spend extra time preparing for the test. The types of questions are different from what students normally face in class. Exams in high school are focused on a specific topic in a given subject, while the SAT test general topics in math and English. Students in school are tested objectively on the course work while the SAT tests are subjectively on topics that they are suppose to be familiar with. According to the test, all eleventh graders are supposed to know high-level vocabulary and interpret reading passages be very subjective at times. People interpret reading material differently. What are the chances they interpret it correctly by answering the questions right? Rich people tend to hire an SAT tutor or enroll in class. These lessons are helping students raise their scores significantly. Then what happens to unfortunate poor students who cannot enroll in class? They get a lower score or get lucky and obtain a good score. Colleges cannot tell who has been tutored and who has not gone to SAT prep classes, giving students, who enroll in class, an immense advantage over students who did not enroll in class.

While students are trying to improve their scores, ETS comes up with a few rights and responsibilities for them to follow. Test takers are permitted and expected to prepare "for the test appropriately, following program requirements, and not copying or taking secure materials" ("Standards for Quality and Fairness"). Although these rights sound appealing, they have no affect on overall fairness of the test. All these rights are common sense statements that are used for protection against disgruntled test takers. The Scholastic Aptitude Test is a standardized test that tells college little to nothing about the test taker. It only shows how many questions one can get right in a very short period. The SAT test focuses too much on quantity. The test takers' personal traits and latent abilities are much more important than the number of test questions answered correctly. The test underrates talented people with poor test taking skills. Unless one is lucky, his SAT score will definitely downgrade his abilities and thus may give colleges the wrong message. The test even under predicts freshman grade level of certain ethnic races. Brigham's prediction was correct. The ETS spends more time trying to persuade more students to take the test than making improvements. Most students are given the message that SAT is the only thing that will determine whether one goes to college or not. Obviously, there are different ways to get into college. Most students over look that. How can this test, controlled by an incompetent "nonprofit" organization, be use to decide someone's future? Simple, it can't.

Members

Community

FEATURES