Why did the framers of the Constitution fear 'excessive democracy'? In what ways were the framers able to limit its influence on the structure of government?

http://paralegallindaarnold.wordpress.com/american-government/why-did-the-framers-fear-excessive-democracy/

The framers of the Constitution had several concerns about excessive democracy. They feared that a direct democracy, where decisions are made by the majority of the population, could lead to the tyranny of the majority, which could potentially disregard the rights and interests of minority groups. They also worried that unchecked democracy could result in unstable and inefficient government decisions.

To limit the influence of excessive democracy, the framers established a system of checks and balances, as well as incorporated various mechanisms to protect minority rights. Here are some ways in which they limited the influence of excessive democracy:

1. Representative government: Rather than a pure direct democracy, the framers established a representative democracy. This meant that instead of citizens directly making decisions, they would elect representatives who would make decisions on their behalf. This system allowed for more deliberation and prevented hasty, uninformed decision-making.

2. The Electoral College: The framers created the Electoral College as a mechanism for electing the president. It was designed to ensure that the selection of the president was not solely in the hands of the public, but rather a combination of popular vote and state legislatures. This was meant to act as a safeguard against the possibility of a poorly-informed or ill-intentioned majority making an unwise decision.

3. Separation of powers: The Constitution created three separate branches of government: the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Each branch has a distinct set of powers and responsibilities, and they are designed to serve as checks on one another. This system helps prevent any one branch or group from gaining excessive power.

4. Bill of Rights: The framers incorporated a Bill of Rights as the first ten amendments to the Constitution. These rights protect individual freedoms and liberties, regardless of the will of the majority. This serves as a safeguard against the potential abuses of power by the majority, ensuring that minority rights are protected.

In summary, the framers of the Constitution feared excessive democracy due to concerns of potential tyranny of the majority and instability in decision-making. To limit its influence, they implemented a representative government, the Electoral College, separation of powers, and the Bill of Rights to ensure checks and balances and protect minority rights.

The framers of the Constitution, also known as the Founding Fathers, expressed concerns about "excessive democracy" due to their belief that unchecked majority rule could lead to tyranny and the violation of individual rights. They believed that a system of government solely based on direct democracy might be vulnerable to the whims and passions of the majority, potentially jeopardizing the stability and balance of power essential for effective governance.

To limit the potential negative effects of excessive democracy, the framers implemented various mechanisms within the structure of government. Here are a few ways they achieved this:

1. Indirect election of representatives: The framers established a system of representative democracy, rather than direct democracy, to ensure that decisions were made by elected officials who could carefully consider issues and exercise judgment on behalf of the people. This arrangement aimed to prevent rash decisions driven by popular passions.

2. Separation of powers: The framers incorporated the principle of separation of powers, dividing authority among three branches of government – the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This division was intended to create a system of checks and balances, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful and curbing the potential for tyranny.

3. The Electoral College: The framers designed the Electoral College as the method for electing the president. This system acts as an intermediary between citizens and the presidency, where electors chosen by the states cast their votes for president and vice president. This mechanism allows for a filtering of public opinion, preventing the direct election of the president by the majority vote of the people.

4. Limited suffrage: Initially, suffrage was limited to white male property owners, reflecting the framers' purposeful restriction of voting rights to a specific segment of the population. This selective approach was meant to prevent what they considered the uneducated and less responsible elements of society from having too much influence.

It's important to note that while these measures were intended to check the potential excesses of direct democracy, they were not without controversy and have evolved over time through constitutional amendments, court interpretations, and social movements striving for broader inclusivity and greater democratic participation.