Which of these is a natural result of specialization?
A)Isolation is caused by specialization.
B)When people specialize they become rich.
C)Specialization leads to interdependence.***
D)Specialization leaves people worse off than without.
Why were the Europeans able to drive Australia's Aborigines off the best land and into the dry interior?
A) The Europeans paid the Aborigines a large amount of money.
B) The Europeans had better military technology and equipment. ****
C) The Aborigines were nomadic and did not stay in one location.
D) The Aborigines were easily able to farm and graze sheep there.
Most democratic countries have a mixed economy with a differing balance between a market and command economy.
Which country has/had a strong mixed economy?
A) Cuba
B) Australia
C) North Korea
D) Soviet Union****
If governments around Europe reduced funding for primary and secondary schools, which of these would be the MOST likely to be the result?
A) Europeans would take more vacations.
B) Europeans' standard of living would decrease.***
C) Europe would export more "high tech" products.
D) People would have more money to spend on "luxury goods."
your dumb you live in a trash can
Did you see this?
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1495148245#1495148245.1495150309
To determine the correct answer to the question "Which of these is a natural result of specialization?" --
A) Isolation is caused by specialization.
B) When people specialize they become rich.
C) Specialization leads to interdependence.
D) Specialization leaves people worse off than without.
We need to understand the concept of specialization and its effects. Specialization refers to the concentration of individuals, organizations, or countries on a specific task, skill, or industry. It allows for increased productivity and efficiency.
Option A, isolation caused by specialization, is not a direct result of specialization. Specialization usually promotes interaction and interdependence rather than isolation.
Option B, when people specialize they become rich, can be a potential outcome as specialization allows individuals to hone their skills, which can lead to better job opportunities and higher incomes. However, this outcome is not always guaranteed for everyone.
Option C, specialization leads to interdependence, is the most accurate answer. When individuals, organizations, or countries specialize, they become dependent on others who specialize in complementary areas. This interdependence fosters collaboration and increased efficiency.
Option D, specialization leaves people worse off than without, is not necessarily true. Specialization generally leads to increased productivity and economic growth, benefiting individuals and societies.
Therefore, the correct answer is C) Specialization leads to interdependence.
To determine the correct answer to the question "Why were the Europeans able to drive Australia's Aborigines off the best land and into the dry interior?" --
A) The Europeans paid the Aborigines a large amount of money.
B) The Europeans had better military technology and equipment.
C) The Aborigines were nomadic and did not stay in one location.
D) The Aborigines were easily able to farm and graze sheep there.
We need to understand the historical context and events that led to this outcome.
Option A, the Europeans paying the Aborigines a large amount of money, is not a significant factor in the displacement of the Aborigines. The interactions between Europeans and Aborigines were often marked by conflict and dispossession rather than monetary transactions.
Option B, the Europeans having better military technology and equipment, is the most accurate answer. The European colonization of Australia involved the use of superior weaponry, such as firearms, against the indigenous population. This technological advantage gave the Europeans the upper hand in conflicts and contributed to their ability to displace the Aborigines from desirable lands.
Option C, the Aborigines being nomadic and not staying in one location, is not a valid reason for their displacement. The Aborigines had an intricate relationship with their land and had been living in Australia for thousands of years prior to European colonization.
Option D, the Aborigines being easily able to farm and graze sheep there, is not a plausible explanation. The arrival of European settlers introduced new farming methods and land use practices which gradually replaced traditional Aboriginal practices.
Therefore, the correct answer is B) The Europeans had better military technology and equipment.
To determine the correct answer to the question "Which country has/had a strong mixed economy?" --
A) Cuba
B) Australia
C) North Korea
D) Soviet Union
We need to understand the concept of a mixed economy and identify a country that exemplifies it.
A mixed economy refers to an economic system that combines elements of both a market economy and a command economy. It involves a mix of private and state ownership of resources and the presence of both market forces and government intervention in economic activities.
Option A, Cuba, and Option C, North Korea, have predominantly command economies with limited market-oriented elements. These countries are known for strong government control and central planning.
Option B, Australia, does have a mixed economy, but it is not particularly known for having a strong mixed economy compared to other countries.
Option D, Soviet Union, is the most accurate answer. The Soviet Union, which existed from 1922 to 1991, had a centrally planned economy with significant state control over resources and production. While it did have some market-oriented reforms in its later years, it primarily exemplified a mixed economy with a dominant command economy approach.
Therefore, the correct answer is D) Soviet Union.
To determine the correct answer to the question "If governments around Europe reduced funding for primary and secondary schools, which of these would be the MOST likely to be the result?" --
A) Europeans would take more vacations.
B) Europeans' standard of living would decrease.
C) Europe would export more "high tech" products.
D) People would have more money to spend on "luxury goods."
We need to understand the impact of reduced funding for primary and secondary schools on society.
Option A, Europeans taking more vacations, is not a direct outcome of reduced funding for schools.
Option B, Europeans' standard of living would decrease, is the most likely answer. Education plays a crucial role in skill development, employability, and economic growth. Reduced funding for schools can lead to a decline in the quality of education, resulting in lower skills, reduced job opportunities, and a decrease in overall living standards.
Option C, Europe exporting more "high tech" products, is not directly related to reduced funding for schools. Export competitiveness is influenced by various factors such as innovation, investment, and infrastructure.
Option D, people having more money to spend on "luxury goods," is unlikely as reduced funding for schools may have negative economic implications, leading to financial constraints and reduced disposable income for individuals.
Therefore, the correct answer is B) Europeans' standard of living would decrease.