Which best expresses how Missouri's application for statehood threatened the future of slaves?


It could have given more power to the states in favor of slavery.**

People in the Missouri Territory had no mercy for runaway slaves.

The governor of the territory believed that slaves should never be free.

The plantation owners in the Missouri Territory wanted to outlaw hiring freed slaves.

A?

Right.

Thank you :)

You're welcome.

To determine the answer, we must analyze Missouri's application for statehood and its potential impact on slavery.

Missouri's application for statehood threatened the future of slaves primarily because it could have given more power to the states in favor of slavery. As a new state, Missouri would have been able to determine its stance on slavery independently. The concern was that its admission as a slave state would tilt the balance of power in Congress in favor of pro-slavery states, potentially leading to the expansion of slavery into new territories. This would have had significant implications for the future of slavery in the United States.

Therefore, the statement "It could have given more power to the states in favor of slavery" best expresses how Missouri's application for statehood threatened the future of slaves.