1.Only claims that can be objectively verified can be trusted.
2.Many people have reported encounters with ghosts.
1. unacceptable; problems in language
2. acceptable by testimony
I just want to confirm if these answers are right.
I question whether "reported encounters" are verifiable.
then should it be unacceptable by testimony?
1. Your answer for the first statement is correct. Claims that can be objectively verified are generally more trustworthy because they are based on empirical evidence and can be evaluated using established standards and methodologies. On the other hand, claims that cannot be objectively verified may be subjective, biased, or based on personal beliefs, making them less reliable.
2. Your answer for the second statement is also correct. Many people reporting encounters with ghosts falls under the category of testimony. Testimony refers to personal accounts or experiences shared by individuals, and while it can provide valuable information, it also comes with potential limitations. Testimony can be influenced by personal beliefs, perceptions, biases, flaws in memory, or even intentionally false claims. Therefore, while many people may have reported encounters with ghosts, it is important to critically evaluate their credibility and consider alternative explanations.