Which of the following best describes why sit-down strikes resulted in success for workers?
A Owners lost more money the longer strikers occupied the factories.
B The strikes forced workers to agree to management’s terms.
C The strikes allowed workers to form new company unions.
D The strikers generally won the sympathy of owners and company management.
A
Yes, A.
To determine which of the options is the correct answer, let's analyze each choice and find out how to approach the question systematically.
Option A states that owners lost more money the longer strikers occupied the factories. This option could be a potential reason for the success of sit-down strikes. To confirm if this is the best choice, we need to evaluate the other options.
Option B suggests that the strikes forced workers to agree to management's terms. However, if the workers were successful, it wouldn't make sense for them to give in to management's demands, so we can eliminate this option as a likely answer.
Option C states that the strikes allowed workers to form new company unions. Although forming new unions could be a desirable outcome for the workers, it doesn't necessarily guarantee success in the strike itself. Therefore, this option seems less likely to be the best answer.
Lastly, option D claims that the strikers generally won the sympathy of owners and company management. This option aligns with the perspective that if the strikers received sympathy and support from the owners and management, it would increase their chances of success.
To confirm the best answer, we need to evaluate the options based on historical evidence or reliable sources. In this case, it is challenging to determine the historical context without further information.
So, to find the correct answer, it is advisable to consult a reliable source, such as history textbooks or scholarly articles, to gain a deeper understanding of the factors that contributed to the success of sit-down strikes.