How did the supreme court decision in Worcester v Georgia and the Indian Removal Act lead to the removal and resettlement of native American groups?
lol Exactly one year later later
A year later, they reversed themselves, and it made President Jackson mad, and he refused to abide by the court ruling, and moved the Indians out.
I dont know how to say this to ya'll but i AM the future and i beat both of you lol (jk)
XOXO
The Supreme Court decision in Worcester v Georgia and the Indian Removal Act played significant roles in the removal and resettlement of Native American groups in the United States. Here's an explanation of how these two events were connected and contributed to this outcome:
1. Worcester v Georgia: In 1832, the Supreme Court heard the case of Worcester v Georgia. In this case, the Court was asked to determine whether the state of Georgia had the authority to regulate the activities of Samuel Worcester, a non-Native American missionary working among the Cherokee tribe. The Court ruled that the state of Georgia lacked jurisdiction over the Cherokee Nation, as they were considered a sovereign entity with their own governance.
2. Indian Removal Act: In 1830, prior to the Worcester v Georgia decision, the U.S. Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. This act authorized the federal government to negotiate treaties with Native American tribes residing in the southeastern United States, with the goal of relocating them to land west of the Mississippi River.
The connection between these two events can be explained as follows:
a. Conflict with state laws: Following the Worcester v Georgia decision, where the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority over the Cherokee, tensions escalated between the federal government and the states. Some states, including Georgia, refused to uphold the Court's decision and continued to assert control over Native American lands. This conflict highlighted the need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing the issue of Native American sovereignty.
b. Justification for removal: The Indian Removal Act, passed two years after Worcester v Georgia, provided legal grounds for the forced removal of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands. Supporters of the act argued that relocation was necessary to protect Native Americans from potential conflicts with non-Native American settlers and promote their assimilation into American society.
c. Implementation of removal policy: The federal government, under President Andrew Jackson's administration, began negotiating treaties with Native American tribes that would exchange their lands in the East for new territories to the west of the Mississippi River. These negotiated agreements, often achieved through coercion and deceit, resulted in the forced removal of many tribes such as the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole, in what is now known as the Trail of Tears.
In summary, the Supreme Court's ruling in Worcester v Georgia recognizing Native American sovereignty clashed with states' rights, and the Indian Removal Act further legitimized the policy of forced removal. Together, these events set the stage for the removal and resettlement of many Native American groups, ultimately leading to the displacement and suffering of thousands.