What conclusion can you draw about the comparative advantage other countries have in farming over Japan and the Koreas?

So, What Does This Question Mean? Also, whats Comparative Advantage?

hint: Japanese eat a lot more fish than people on the great plains eat.

hurry

Japan eats more fish and seafood them people on the great plains , this makes farming less valuable to Japan and Korea . But to other countries farming brings in more money due to them eating vegetables Rather then seafood and fish.


Those are facts so now create your conclusion

Thx soo much

This question asks for a conclusion regarding the comparative advantage that other countries have in farming over Japan and the Koreas. To understand this, we need to first clarify what comparative advantage means.

Comparative advantage is an economic concept that refers to the ability of a country, individual, or group to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than others. It is based on the principle that even if one country is more efficient in producing all goods or services, it can still benefit from specializing in and trading the products it can produce at a lower opportunity cost.

In the context of this question, we are examining the farming sector and how other countries might have a comparative advantage over Japan and the Koreas. We can draw conclusions by considering a few factors:

1. Natural Resources: Assess the availability and quality of natural resources such as arable land, water, and climate conditions. Countries with abundant and fertile land, suitable climate, and access to water resources may have a comparative advantage in farming.

2. Technological Advancement: Consider the extent to which countries have advanced agricultural technologies, including machinery, irrigation systems, and genetic modifications. Technologically advanced countries may be able to produce agricultural products more efficiently, giving them a comparative advantage.

3. Labor Force: Examine the skills, education, and size of the labor force in the agricultural sector. Countries with a large, skilled, and cost-effective agricultural workforce may be able to produce agricultural goods at a lower opportunity cost.

4. Government Policies: Consider the impact of government policies, including subsidies, tariffs, and regulations, on the farming sector. Favorable policies that support agriculture can enhance a country's comparative advantage.

By analyzing these factors, we can draw conclusions about the comparative advantage that other countries may have in farming over Japan and the Koreas. It is important to note that this analysis would need to be done using specific data and information about each country's farming sector to provide a conclusive answer to the question.

A comparative advantage is something that makes the farming at least somewhat better.

What do other countries have that make farming easier and more productive than in Japan and the Koreas?