Please help with math

1. Provide a counterexample for the statement in parentheses. (1 point)“If a figure has four sides, then it is a square”

2. Identify the hypothesis of the statement in parentheses. (1 point)“If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent and supplementary.”

3. Identify the conclusion of the statement in parentheses. (1 point)“If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent and supplementary.

4. Write the statement in parentheses as a biconditional. (1 point)“If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent and supplementary.”

5. Is the statement in parentheses a good definition? Explain. (2 points)“Obtuse angles are fairly large.”

why is nobody heLPING-

1. To provide a counterexample for the statement "If a figure has four sides, then it is a square," we need to find a figure with four sides that is not a square. One example of a counterexample would be a rectangle. A rectangle has four sides, but it is not a square because its opposite sides are not equal in length.

2. The hypothesis of the statement "If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent and supplementary" is "two angles form a linear pair."

3. The conclusion of the statement "If two angles form a linear pair, then they are adjacent and supplementary" is "they are adjacent and supplementary."

4. To write the statement in parentheses as a biconditional, we need to express both the conditional statement and its converse. The biconditional statement would be: "Two angles form a linear pair if and only if they are adjacent and supplementary."

5. The statement "Obtuse angles are fairly large" is not a good definition. A good definition should be clear, precise, and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the defined term. The statement doesn't provide a clear definition of what makes an angle obtuse, nor does it provide any specific criteria or measurement. It is too subjective and does not accurately define the concept of obtuse angles.