how would the Philippine government respond to an insurgency?

1) government would try to work with their members
2) government would support it
3) government would ignore it
4) government would fight it fiercely

When you have an answer, I'll be glad to check it. Your text materials probably are hiding the answer somewhere in them, if you can read them and discover the hidden treasure. Failing that, read these articles for clues:

http://www.bing.com/search?q=governnment%20reactions%20to%20insurgencies%20in%20the%20Phillipines&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=governnment%20reactions%20to%20insurgencies%20in%20the%20ph&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=290117EAB4604422A30BDAA3C7C6D4E0&ajf=60

The response of the Philippine government to an insurgency would primarily depend on the specific context and the severity of the insurgency. However, typically, the government's response to an insurgency involves a combination of strategies and actions. Here are some possible approaches:

1) Government would try to work with their members:
In cases where the insurgency is driven by specific grievances or demands, the government may attempt to engage in dialogue and negotiation with the insurgent group. This approach involves identifying the root causes of the insurgency and seeking ways to address the underlying issues. Government representatives may meet with insurgent leaders to discuss their concerns and explore potential solutions. The objective here is to find a peaceful resolution and prevent further violence.

2) Government would support it:
It is highly unlikely for a government to support an insurgency as it would contradict its own interests and the principles of law and order. However, in rare cases where there are internal divisions within the government or elements who sympathize with the insurgents, there might be instances of partial or covert support for the insurgency. Such situations tend to be highly complex and can lead to further instability.

3) Government would ignore it:
Ignoring an insurgency is generally not an effective strategy for the government. If the government chooses to ignore the insurgency, it may potentially allow the insurgency to gain strength and pose a more significant threat over time. Ignoring the problem can also lead to a deterioration of security and public trust. Thus, this approach is unlikely to be adopted as a deliberate response.

4) Government would fight it fiercely:
When faced with a significant and persistent insurgency that threatens the stability and security of the country, the government may choose to respond with a firm military or security-focused approach. This response typically involves deploying security forces to actively combat and suppress the insurgency. The government may conduct counter-insurgency operations, such as intelligence gathering, patrolling, and targeted military actions. The objective here is to dismantle and neutralize the insurgency through military means.

It is important to note that the specific response will always depend on the nature of the insurgency, the government's capabilities, the political climate, and the availability of resources. The most effective response usually includes a combination of political, socioeconomic, and security measures to address the root causes of the insurgency while also addressing the immediate security concerns.