1. How long did it take for him to finish the 200-kilometer course?
2. It took 6 hours and 49 minutes.
3. It took him 6 hours and 49 minutes.
4. It took 6 hours and 49 minutes for him.
(Are the answers all correct?)
5. What was Henk Angenent's record?
6. He finished the race in 6 hours and 49 minutes.
7. His record was 6 hours and 49 minutes.
8. It was 6 hours and 49 minutes.
(Are the answers correct? Do we have some more possible answers?)
2 and 3 are the best answers for 1. (4 is phrased awkwardly.)
6, 7 and 8 are all good answers for 5.
1. How long did it take for him to finish the 200-kilometer course?
All four answers (2, 3, 4) are correct as they state that it took him 6 hours and 49 minutes to finish the 200-kilometer course. The placement of the time duration in the sentence varies slightly, but the information conveyed is the same.
2. What was Henk Angenent's record?
Both answers (6 and 7) are correct as they state that Henk Angenent finished the race in 6 hours and 49 minutes. The placement of the record information in the sentence varies slightly, but again, the information conveyed is the same.
Regarding additional possible answers:
There may be alternative ways to answer these questions depending on the context and the specific information desired. However, given the information provided, the given answers are correct and sufficient.