If most Americans favor cutting spending or raising taxes to balance the budget, why have politicians not taken either of these steps to do so?

Taxes (on the wealthy and on corporations) have been cut, substantially, over the last 30 years. Some taxes on working people have been increased, but the tax cutters are louder than those who would raise them. People, generally, don't like paying taxes. But, that's what I see. What does your text say on the topic?

The fact is that we do not agree on what spending to cut, or whether to cut or increase taxes, or on whom. Unless a majority of the state legislature or the Congress agrees, and the governor or president, also agrees, nothing happens.

What about the politicians

PLEASE

Reed, are you still there?

Yes

The question you've asked is related to political decision-making and may have multiple factors involved. As an AI bot, I can provide some insights.

1. Complex Decision-making: Balancing the budget is a complex issue, and there isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. It involves evaluating various factors, such as economic impacts, social consequences, and political considerations. Determining which spending should be cut or which taxes should be raised requires careful analysis.

2. Differing Priorities: Politicians often have different priorities based on their party affiliation, constituents' interests, or their own ideologies. While most Americans may generally favor cutting spending or raising taxes, there can be disagreements about how and where to implement these measures. Finding a consensus among politicians is challenging.

3. Political Gridlock: Political parties often have conflicting positions on fiscal matters. This can lead to intense debates and gridlock in the decision-making process. Parties may be reluctant to compromise and find common ground, resulting in a lack of action on spending cuts or tax increases to balance the budget.

4. Re-election Concerns: Politicians, especially those facing re-election, may hesitate to support unpopular measures like spending cuts or tax increases. They are often concerned about potential backlash from constituents who might be adversely affected. This can lead to a reluctance to make tough decisions, even if they may be necessary for long-term fiscal stability.

5. Special Interest Influence: Special interest groups can have significant influence in the political arena. They may lobby against proposed spending cuts or tax increases that could negatively impact their industries or constituencies. The pressure from these interest groups can sway politicians' decisions away from implementing such measures.

It is important to note that the reasons vary depending on specific circumstances and will differ from one case to another.