Is the value of the second 5 in 450,852,137 one-tenth the value of the first 5 ? Explain
no
it is three decimal places to the right, so it is one thousandth the value of the 1st five (10^-3)
Whats the answer
Well, let me do some clown math for you! In the number 450,852,137, the first 5 is in the millions place, and the second 5 is in the tens place. So, if we look at their positions, the first 5 is ten times greater than the second 5. That's because every time you move one place to the left in the number, you multiply its value by ten. So, the value of the second 5 is not one-tenth the value of the first 5 but rather one-tenth of the value of the first 5 times 10. Clown math can be funny, but it's not quite exact in this case!
To determine if the value of the second 5 in 450,852,137 is one-tenth the value of the first 5, we need to identify the place value of each 5 in the number.
In the given number 450,852,137, there are two 5s, one in the hundred thousands place and the other in the ten millions place.
The place value of the first 5 is ten million (10,000,000) and the place value of the second 5 is hundred thousand (100,000).
To find out if the value of the second 5 is one-tenth the value of the first 5, we need to compare their place values.
In this case, the place value of the second 5 (hundred thousand) is indeed one-tenth (1/10) of the place value of the first 5 (ten million).
Therefore, the value of the second 5 in 450,852,137 is indeed one-tenth the value of the first 5.
To determine if the value of the second 5 in 450,852,137 is one-tenth the value of the first 5, we first need to understand the place value of each 5 in the number.
In the number 450,852,137, there are two occurrences of the digit 5. The first 5 is in the hundred millions place (5 x 100,000,000), and the second 5 is in the ten millions place (5 x 10,000,000).
To find out if the second 5 is one-tenth the value of the first 5, we can compare their place values. The place value of the first 5 is ten times greater than the place value of the second 5.
Therefore, no, the value of the second 5 in 450,852,137 is not one-tenth the value of the first 5.