Sentence 6: In this case,the injured driver received payment from his own insurance company.
Which of the following is the best way to write the underlined portion of this sentence? If you think the original is the best way,choose option 1
1.driver received
2.driver,received
3.driver will have received
4.driver receives
5.driver,receives
1 ?
I agree.
Grrrrreat thank you!
You're welcome!
To determine the best way to write the underlined portion of the sentence, let's analyze the grammar and context.
The original sentence states, "the injured driver received payment from his own insurance company." The verb "received" is in the past tense, which is appropriate because it describes an action that has already happened.
Let's examine the provided options:
1. "driver received": This option maintains the original past tense verb "received" and is grammatically correct. Therefore, it could be considered the best way to write the underlined portion of the sentence.
2. "driver, received": In this option, a comma is added after "driver." However, this creates a comma splice, which is a grammatical error. It would be best to avoid this option.
3. "driver will have received": This option changes the verb tense to future perfect tense ("will have received"), which implies that the action has not yet occurred. However, the original sentence describes an action that has already happened, so this option would be incorrect.
4. "driver receives": This option changes the verb tense to present tense ("receives"), which suggests that the action is happening currently or regularly. Since the action took place in the past, this present tense would be incorrect.
5. "driver, receives": Similarly to option 2, this option introduces a comma splice and it would be best to avoid it.
Therefore, based on the analysis, option 1, "driver received," is the best way to write the underlined portion of the sentence.