What is Nell Irvin Painter’s best counter-argument to Bob Dole’s claim that “fighting discrimination should never become an excuse for abandoning the color-blind ideal. A. The color-blind ideal is unrealistic, and abolishing affirmative action will prevent certain races and genders from getting jobs. B.She was helped by affirmative action, and she wouldn’t have been accepted to Harvard without it. C. Gender and race are constitutionally protected classes that utilize strict scrutiny in determining constitutionality.
D.Faculty diversity reaps academic rewards by exposing students to differ I believe the answer is A
I agree. A is the best choice.
Thank you
To determine Nell Irvin Painter's best counter-argument to Bob Dole's claim, it is necessary to examine the provided answer choices.
A. The answer choice A stating that "The color-blind ideal is unrealistic, and abolishing affirmative action will prevent certain races and genders from getting jobs" is a plausible argument against Bob Dole's claim. Nell Irvin Painter can argue that the color-blind ideal fails to consider the reality of systemic discrimination and inequality that certain races and genders face. Abolishing affirmative action without addressing these disparities can lead to further exclusion and hinder opportunities for marginalized groups.
B. The answer choice B suggests that "She was helped by affirmative action, and she wouldn't have been accepted to Harvard without it." While this statement may provide personal anecdotal evidence, it focuses on a particular case and may not be the best counter-argument to Bob Dole's claim. It is essential to examine broader societal effects rather than just individual experiences.
C. The answer choice C states that "Gender and race are constitutionally protected classes that utilize strict scrutiny in determining constitutionality." This argument highlights the legal and constitutional aspects of discrimination. However, it does not directly counter Bob Dole's claim regarding the color-blind ideal.
D. It appears that the end of the answer choice D is incomplete. Assuming the complete statement is "Faculty diversity reaps academic rewards by exposing students to differ[ent perspectives]," it does touch upon the benefits of diversity in educational environments but does not directly address the color-blind ideal.
Considering these options, Nell Irvin Painter's best counter-argument to Bob Dole's claim of not abandoning the color-blind ideal would likely be option A, which points out the unrealistic nature of the color-blind ideal and the potential negative consequences of abolishing affirmative action.