20.)Which answer best explains the Cherokee's main argument against Georgia in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia?
A.)The Cherokee argued they had legally bought their land from other tribes.
B.)The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.***
C.)The Cherokee argued they had already signed an agreement with the federal government.
D.)The Cherokee argued they had given all their land to the missions so Georgia had no case.
I pick "B", am I'm correct?
Yes, you are correct.
Yea you are
Yes, you are correct. The Cherokee's main argument against Georgia in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was that they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws. Option B is the correct answer.
Yes, you are correct! The answer is B) The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.
To arrive at this answer, you could have analyzed the given options and thought about the main argument that the Cherokee presented in the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia case. Then, using your knowledge of the case or by conducting additional research, you could have identified that the Cherokee's main argument was centered around their assertion that they were a distinct nation and not governed by the laws of Georgia. By doing this, you would have arrived at the correct response. Well done!