19. Which answer best explains how the Articles of Confederation set up governmental roles for dealing with foreign governments?
Congress had the power to make foreign treaties.***
The states had the power to make foreign treaties.
Congress could write treaties, but they needed to be approved by the states.
The states could write treaties, but they needed to be approved by Congress
You are correct.
Thanks!!
whats the answer
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the options:
Option 1: Congress had the power to make foreign treaties.
Option 2: The states had the power to make foreign treaties.
Option 3: Congress could write treaties, but they needed to be approved by the states.
Option 4: The states could write treaties, but they needed to be approved by Congress.
To understand how the Articles of Confederation set up the governmental roles for dealing with foreign governments, we need to consider the structure and powers granted to the different levels of government.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the United States operated under a system of limited centralized power and strong state sovereignty. The central government, represented by the Continental Congress, was relatively weak compared to the state governments.
Given this information, let's examine the options:
Option 1: Congress had the power to make foreign treaties.
This option aligns with the idea that Congress had the authority to handle foreign affairs. Therefore, it could be a correct answer.
Option 2: The states had the power to make foreign treaties.
While the states possessed a significant amount of sovereignty, granting them the power to conduct international affairs independently would contradict the intention of a unified foreign policy. Therefore, this option is unlikely to be correct.
Option 3: Congress could write treaties, but they needed to be approved by the states.
This option implies that Congress alone could draft treaties, but they would require approval from the states. This concept does not align with the decentralized nature of the Articles of Confederation. So, it is not the best explanation.
Option 4: The states could write treaties, but they needed to be approved by Congress.
This option suggests that the states could independently draft treaties, but they would require approval from Congress. This idea aligns with the decentralized nature of the Articles of Confederation, with Congress acting as a check on state actions. However, it contradicts the concept of a unified foreign policy. Therefore, it is not the best explanation.
By considering these options in the context of the Articles of Confederation, the answer that best aligns with the decentralized nature of the government and the limited power of Congress is:
Congress had the power to make foreign treaties.
So, the correct answer is option 1.