This is from my question I posted earlier:
What is the corruption Ronald Reagan is hiding in his Berlin Wall speech? What is the bad thing he's hiding?
After reading the speech, I can only conclude that Reagan want to rally the people of West Berlin to oppose communism. I can't seem to find/understand the deeper meaning of what he's trying to hide.
Is it because Reagan wants to hide the criticism he got for violating the INF Treaty?
To understand Ronald Reagan's Berlin Wall speech and any potential hidden corruption, it is essential to examine the historical and political context of the speech.
The Berlin Wall speech was delivered by President Ronald Reagan on June 12, 1987, near the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin. In this speech, Reagan urged Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall, which had physically divided East and West Berlin since 1961.
From the text of the speech itself, there is no direct reference to any corruption or hidden wrongdoing on Reagan's part. The underlying message of Reagan's speech was his strong opposition to communism and his support for the reunification of Germany.
As you rightly mentioned, the speech's purpose was to rally the people of West Berlin against communism. Reagan sought to challenge the Soviet Union's control over the Eastern Bloc and emphasize the importance of liberty and human rights. He called for the removal of barriers and the promotion of openness and freedom.
While Reagan's speech did not explicitly address any criticism he may have received for violating the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, it is important to note that the INF Treaty was signed between the United States and the Soviet Union in 1987, just a few months before Reagan's Berlin Wall speech. The treaty aimed to reduce the deployment of nuclear missiles with intermediate ranges in Europe.
Reagan's potential violation of the INF Treaty and any criticism he may have faced would be separate from the content of the Berlin Wall speech. To gain a better understanding of the specific corruption or bad thing Reagan may have been hiding, it would be necessary to look into broader historical sources, archival material, or scholarly discussions that focus on Reagan's presidency and policies.
Keep in mind that publicly available information may not always reveal hidden or corrupt intentions. Critical analysis and evaluation of historical events and political decisions often involve careful examination of a range of sources and perspectives.