Analyze the validity of the following argument:

Sally argues, "Mom, your rules are way too strict! Melissa's mother lets her stay out until 2:00 AM on weekends. Peter's parents let him go to all-night raves even on school nights. Tom's parents don't even give him a curfew! Nobody in the whole school has curfews as strict as yours!"

Thank you!

Three people are not everybody!

That's what I'd say, too, if my daughter made that argument. BUT, do YOU think Sally's argument is a good one or not, and if so, why?

To analyze the validity of an argument, it is necessary to evaluate the structure of the argument and the credibility of the evidence provided.

In this argument, Sally is claiming that her mother's rules are too strict compared to other parents in her school. Let's break down the argument and assess its validity step by step:

1. Sally claims that Melissa's mother lets her stay out until 2:00 AM on weekends.
2. Sally claims that Peter's parents let him go to all-night raves even on school nights.
3. Sally claims that Tom's parents don't give him a curfew.
4. Sally concludes that nobody in the whole school has curfews as strict as her own mother's rules.

To evaluate the validity of these claims, we need to consider the evidence presented. The argument relies solely on anecdotal evidence from Sally's perspective, which makes it subjective since she is comparing her own experience with those of her friends.

To determine the truth or validity of Sally's claims, we would need more objective evidence. This could involve seeking additional information from the mentioned parents or a wider survey of curfew policies across the school or community. Without this broader evidence, it is difficult to verify the accuracy of Sally's claims and deem the argument as valid.

In summary, the argument's validity is questionable due to its reliance on subjective and anecdotal evidence. To fully assess the claim, it is necessary to gather more objective data or seek more reliable sources of information.