In the FAA-McDonnell Douglas DC-10 case, the author implies or asserts which of the following?
A. The FAA immediately fixed the cargo door.
B. McDonnell Douglas eventually complied with the FAA’s order to strengthen cargo doors and cabin floors.
C. The Canadian government was at fault for the cargo door problem.
D. The FAA was guilty of political
is it B?
Yes.
thank you Ms.Sue for your help!
You're welcome, Bev.
To determine the answer to this question, let's analyze the given options together with the context of the FAA-McDonnell Douglas DC-10 case.
Option A implies that the FAA immediately fixed the cargo door. However, there is no evidence or reference to support this assertion in the question or the context of the case. Therefore, we can eliminate option A.
Option B states that McDonnell Douglas eventually complied with the FAA's order to strengthen cargo doors and cabin floors. This statement aligns with the information provided in the question. The case likely involved the FAA issuing an order to strengthen cargo doors and cabin floors, and McDonnell Douglas complying with that order. Therefore, option B is a plausible answer.
Option C suggests that the Canadian government was at fault for the cargo door problem. There is no mention of the involvement of the Canadian government in the question or the context of the case. Thus, we can rule out option C.
Option D implies that the FAA was guilty of political something, but it is cut off in the given question. Without the complete statement, it is unclear what is being attributed to the FAA in terms of guilt. Since the question does not provide this information, we cannot consider option D as a possible answer.
Based on the explanations above, it does appear that option B, "McDonnell Douglas eventually complied with the FAA’s order to strengthen cargo doors and cabin floors," aligns with the information given in the question. Therefore, the correct answer is indeed option B.