What should an investigator do if contraband that does not come under the present warrant is found in pursuit of items covered under the original warrant?

Question

What should an investigator do if contraband that does not come under the present warrant is found in pursuit of items covered under the original warrant?

A. Focus on the original warrant
B. Seize the contraband under the present warrant
C. Get a secondary warrant
D. Record it in the SOP and wait for the court’s intervention

I'm sure they are supposed to record their findings and wait for further instruction from the court! Is this correct

Answer 1

Yes, you are correct. The correct answer is D. Record it in the SOP (Standard Operating Procedures) and wait for the court's intervention. If an investigator comes across contraband that is not covered under the original warrant but is discovered during the pursuit of items covered by the warrant, they should document the findings according to their standard operating procedures and await further instructions from the court. It is important for investigators to follow the proper legal procedures and obtain authorization if they want to search or seize items outside the scope of the original warrant.

Answer 2

Yes, you are correct. If contraband is found during the investigation that does not fall under the scope of the original warrant, the investigator should document the finding and wait for further instructions from the court. In this situation, the investigator should choose option D: Record it in the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and wait for the court's intervention. It is essential for investigators to adhere to legal protocols in order to protect the integrity and admissibility of evidence in court. By documenting the discovery of contraband that is beyond the scope of the original warrant, the investigator ensures that all findings are accurately recorded and can be appropriately addressed through the court system.