According to the video “Religion, War, and Violence,” Just War Theory asserts that military intervention (Points : 1)
can be seen as an act of altruism
must always have an altruistic component
must be primarily an act of altruism
must never have an altruistic component
I doubt anyone here has seen the video, but something in here may help:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22just+war+theory%22&oq=%22just+war+theory%22&aqs=chrome..69i57.4281j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
To answer this question, we need to understand the concept of Just War Theory and its components. Just War Theory is an ethical framework that aims to provide guidelines for the justification and conduct of war. It addresses the moral and ethical aspects of resorting to and engaging in warfare.
According to Just War Theory, military intervention can be seen as an act of altruism. Altruism refers to selfless concern for the well-being of others. This means that in certain cases, military intervention can be justified if its primary intention is to protect and benefit others, even at the expense of the intervening nation's self-interest.
Therefore, the correct answer to your question is: "can be seen as an act of altruism."
To arrive at this answer, one could watch the video "Religion, War, and Violence" which would likely explain and discuss Just War Theory and its various components, including the role of altruism in military interventions. Alternatively, one can also refer to academic sources or books that discuss the topic of Just War Theory and examine its principles, including the relationship between military intervention and altruism.