The War Powers Resolution is possibly unconstitutional because:
A.Encroaches upon executive authority.
B.All are correct.
C.It is a legislative right.
D.Was not properly enacted.
To me A is the best answer. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution
To assess whether the War Powers Resolution is possibly unconstitutional or not, let's break down the options provided:
A. Encroaches upon executive authority: The War Powers Resolution, enacted in 1973, gives Congress the power to limit the President's authority to engage in military actions without a formal declaration of war. This provision could be seen as limiting the executive authority and potentially encroaching upon it.
B. All are correct: This option suggests that all the provided statements are correct. If you agree with all the statements, you can choose this option.
C. It is a legislative right: The War Powers Resolution is indeed a legislative act, meaning it was enacted by Congress. It outlines the process and limits concerning the President's authority to deploy military forces.
D. Was not properly enacted: This statement implies that there might be constitutional concerns regarding the procedure by which the War Powers Resolution was enacted. However, it is important to note that the War Powers Resolution was passed by both houses of Congress and signed into law by the President, fulfilling the standard legislative process.
Considering the options given, if you believe that the War Powers Resolution encroaches upon executive authority and is a legislative right, you would select option B - All are correct. However, if you have concerns about the constitutionality of the process through which it was enacted, you may choose option D - Was not properly enacted.