States and localities might prefer block grants to categorical grants because (Points : 1)

they can spend money any way they choose.
they have greater discretion because monies are fungible.
they can completely ignore federal policy priorities.
they can use state and local spending as weapons against their political enemies

they have greater discretion because monies are fungible.

fungible???

I agree.

http://www.google.com/#q=fungible

States and localities might prefer block grants to categorical grants because

States and localities might prefer block grants to categorical grants because they have greater discretion because monies are fungible.

To understand why states and localities might prefer block grants, we need to first understand the difference between block grants and categorical grants.

Block grants are a type of grant where the federal government provides funds to states or localities for broad purposes, such as education, healthcare, or infrastructure. These grants give states and localities more flexibility in deciding how to spend the funds. They have greater discretion because the funds are fungible, meaning they can be used for a variety of purposes rather than being restricted to specific categories or programs.

On the other hand, categorical grants are grants where federal funds are provided for specific purposes or categories, such as education for low-income students or healthcare for specific populations. These grants have more specific guidelines and restrictions on how the funds can be used.

Now, coming back to the question, states and localities might prefer block grants over categorical grants because they can spend the money any way they choose. Since block grants provide more flexibility and discretion, states and localities can allocate the funds according to their specific needs and priorities. This allows them to address a wide range of issues and tailor their spending to the unique requirements of their communities.

However, it is important to note that states and localities cannot completely ignore federal policy priorities when using block grant funds. While they have more freedom to determine how the funds are spent, they still need to use the funds for purposes that align with the general goals and guidelines set by the federal government.

Additionally, the statement that states and localities can use state and local spending as weapons against their political enemies is subjective and may not apply in all cases. The primary purpose of block grants is to provide funding for essential services and projects, and political motives should not play a significant role in the allocation of these funds.