4. An appellate court that hears an appeal on a money laundering case from a district court (Points : 1)

is not concerned with guilt or innocence.
can only send the case back for retrial.
is concerned with whether proper legal procedures were followed during the district court trial.
determines the constitutionality of the law.

Question 5. 5. When the Supreme Court hands down a decision, it is (Points : 1)
often a mixed decision with majority, dissenting, and even concurring opinions.
always a unanimous 9-0 decision.
a law forever and can never be overturned.
always free of politics.

Question 6. 6. The various cases with regards to religious freedom are concerned with excessive entanglements between government and religion. This means (Points : 1)
that non-denominational prayer in schools can be permitted.
voucher systems like the one in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris created a constitutionally allowed choice between public and private schools.
local school boards can provide subsidies to church-related schools.
both religion and government are strengthened when united.

1st Hint: You need to indicate what YOU THINK the correct answers are. Then someone here might be able to help you.

2nd Hint: What YOU THINK does not mean making guesses.

To find the answer for question 4, you would need to understand the role of an appellate court in a money laundering case. An appellate court is not concerned with guilt or innocence, as that is determined by the trial court. The main focus of an appellate court is to determine whether proper legal procedures were followed during the trial in the district court. Therefore, the correct answer for question 4 is: "is concerned with whether proper legal procedures were followed during the district court trial."

To find the answer for question 5, you would need to know about the decision-making process of the Supreme Court. When the Supreme Court hands down a decision, it is not always a unanimous 9-0 decision. More often than not, it is a mixed decision with majority, dissenting, and even concurring opinions. Therefore, the correct answer for question 5 is: "often a mixed decision with majority, dissenting, and even concurring opinions."

To find the answer for question 6, you would need to understand what excessive entanglements between government and religion means in the context of religious freedom cases. Excessive entanglements refer to situations where government actions or policies become too involved or intertwined with religion, potentially infringing upon the separation of church and state. Based on this understanding, the correct answer for question 6 is: "that non-denominational prayer in schools can be permitted." This is because allowing non-denominational prayer in schools would not create an excessive entanglement between government and religion.

Remember to carefully read and analyze the question and consider the context provided in order to determine the correct answer.