which result of the compromise of 1850 did not benefit the north?(1 point)

the fugitive slave law

california's admittance to the union !!!

ending the slave trade in the district of columbia

new mexico not being designated as a slave territory

The result of the Compromise of 1850 that did not benefit the North was the Fugitive Slave Law. Here's how you can determine the answer by analyzing the options:

1. The Fugitive Slave Law: This law required the return of escaped slaves to their owners, even if they had reached free states. While it was intended to benefit the South, it was highly unpopular in the North. Northerners opposed the law because it violated their principles of personal liberty and stirred up tensions over the issue of slavery.

2. California's admittance to the Union: This event benefited the North. By allowing California to enter the Union as a free state, it disrupted the balance of power in Congress between free and slave states, giving the North an advantage.

3. Ending the slave trade in the District of Columbia: This action benefited the North as well. It was seen as a victory for those opposed to slavery, as it limited the spread and practice of slavery in the nation's capital.

4. New Mexico not being designated as a slave territory: This outcome also benefited the North. By not designating New Mexico as a slave territory, it prevented the expansion of slavery into that region, which was a priority for the North.

Given this analysis, the answer to the question is that the Fugitive Slave Law did not benefit the North.

No.