Is there a limit to the different types of arbitration one can go through before taking a case to trial?
My answer is no. why? because if you don't agree the first time when seeking a arbitration than you'r chances of coming to a conclusion are again aren't high. Once you are in court the judge can rule out a arbitration decision.
I understand your reasoning, but let me clarify the concept of arbitration and its relationship with going to trial.
Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution method, which is an alternative to going to court. It involves the parties involved in a dispute agreeing to have a neutral third party (the arbitrator) hear their case and make a binding decision. The decision made by the arbitrator is called an arbitration award.
Now, to answer your question, there is no specific limit to the number of times a person can go through arbitration before taking a case to trial. However, it should be noted that the purpose of arbitration is to provide a quicker and less formal resolution compared to litigation, which involves going to court. Arbitration is often chosen because it is seen as a more efficient and cost-effective method of resolving disputes.
If the parties involved in a dispute are unable to reach a resolution through arbitration and still disagree, they may choose to seek other forms of alternative dispute resolution or ultimately take the case to trial in a court of law. It is the parties' decision whether they want to continue with arbitration or pursue other options.
In summary, while there is no limit to the number of times a person can go through arbitration before going to trial, the intention is for arbitration to be a more streamlined and efficient process, resulting in a binding decision.