which of the following was not a weakness of the articles of confederation (1781-1789)? A) a week "league of friendship" among the states B) the requirement of unanimous approval by all 13 states for amendments C) no judicial branch D) no congressional power to impose taxes
All of them were weaknesses, however the way it was mentioned in most texts it that there was no national judiciary therefore I was thinking maybe its answer C?
I was not aware of a "league of friendship".
Not being sovereign, it does not call the United States of America a "nation" or "government," but instead says, "The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever."
To identify which of the options was not a weakness of the Articles of Confederation (1781-1789), we will analyze each option and determine if it was a weakness or not.
A) A weak "league of friendship" among the states: This was indeed a weakness of the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states were loosely connected and lacked a strong central authority, resulting in a weak sense of unity and cooperation.
B) The requirement of unanimous approval by all 13 states for amendments: This requirement was a weakness of the Articles of Confederation. It made it extremely difficult to amend or modify the Articles since any single state could effectively veto proposed changes.
C) No judicial branch: This option suggests that the absence of a judicial branch was not a weakness of the Articles of Confederation. To confirm if this is accurate, we need to understand the role and importance of a judicial branch in a government system.
A judicial branch is responsible for interpreting laws, resolving disputes, and ensuring justice. The checks and balances provided by a judicial branch are crucial for maintaining stability and upholding the rule of law. Without a judiciary, there would be a lack of oversight and potential for conflicts that outcome from the interpretation and application of laws.
Therefore, the absence of a judicial branch can be considered a weakness of the Articles of Confederation. This option is not the correct answer.
D) No congressional power to impose taxes: This was indeed a weakness of the Articles of Confederation. The Confederation Congress had no authority to levy taxes or enforce tax collection. This financial weakness made it challenging for the central government to fund its operations and address national debts.
From the above analysis, we can conclude that the correct answer is C) no judicial branch, which was not a weakness of the Articles of Confederation.